Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brad Harris" data-source="post: 50073" data-attributes="member: 380">Re: WinRadio and WorkbenchSome more down time today with workbench.Setup:2 computers running Workbench v5.0.5.21 connected to a UHFR, the other using WinRadio WR-G33WSM4 UR1 belt packs tuned to 520.000, 540.000, 550.000, and 570.000Results:WinRadio shows more interfering frequencies which Workbench doesn&#039;t interpolate as intermodal frequencies. BOTH UHfR and the WinRadio show different amounts of offset from the actual frequency (.025 to .100mHz), which leads me to believe it is WorkBench that has the issue, not the WinRadio receiver.The WinRadio software does not have any offsets and hasn&#039;t shown any error.So a new question, how much error is acceptable? I&#039;m all for spending an extra 5 minutes to scan with the WR software, and manually enter in On Air Frequencies in WB Synthesis, but if .100mHz of error is acceptable ..... BRad</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brad Harris, post: 50073, member: 380"] Re: WinRadio and Workbench Some more down time today with workbench. Setup: 2 computers running Workbench v5.0.5.2 1 connected to a UHFR, the other using WinRadio WR-G33WSM 4 UR1 belt packs tuned to 520.000, 540.000, 550.000, and 570.000 Results: WinRadio shows more interfering frequencies which Workbench doesn't interpolate as intermodal frequencies. BOTH UHfR and the WinRadio show different amounts of offset from the actual frequency (.025 to .100mHz), which leads me to believe it is WorkBench that has the issue, not the WinRadio receiver. The WinRadio software does not have any offsets and hasn't shown any error. So a new question, how much error is acceptable? I'm all for spending an extra 5 minutes to scan with the WR software, and manually enter in On Air Frequencies in WB Synthesis, but if .100mHz of error is acceptable ..... BRad [/QUOTE]

Verification