Normal
Re: X32 vs QU 24The opposite is also true. Since there are vastly less Qu-24's out there than X32's the number of failures reported on forums for the Qu-24 is going to be skewed low as well.From what I can tell, the number of people that have had issues with the X32 faders is very small compared to the number of people using them. I hadn't ever heard of an AES50 port failure.I completely agree that sound quality is NOT what will separate these two mixers. They both sound very nice to my ear.On the flip side, the features in the X32 far out shine the Qu-24, and it has more channels as well.The Qu-24 is easier to learn.... especially coming from analog.
Re: X32 vs QU 24
The opposite is also true. Since there are vastly less Qu-24's out there than X32's the number of failures reported on forums for the Qu-24 is going to be skewed low as well.
From what I can tell, the number of people that have had issues with the X32 faders is very small compared to the number of people using them. I hadn't ever heard of an AES50 port failure.
I completely agree that sound quality is NOT what will separate these two mixers. They both sound very nice to my ear.
On the flip side, the features in the X32 far out shine the Qu-24, and it has more channels as well.
The Qu-24 is easier to learn.... especially coming from analog.
