Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Attempting to bring clarity to the nuclear problems facing Japan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rob Timmerman" data-source="post: 24065" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>Re: Attempting to bring clarity to the nuclear problems facing Japan</p><p></p><p>Excellent summary, Phil.</p><p></p><p>For those looking for some more background on the pros and cons of some of the different containment designs, check out this memo from the AEC <a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/greeninc/hanauer.pdf" target="_blank">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/greeninc/hanauer.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>For some perspective, consider that this is a 40+ year old power station. If this were a coal or hydro plant with the same generating capacity, there likely would have been similar (if not worse) damage and loss of life. Making a generating station arbitrarily safe is an exercise in risk analysis and design, with exponentially increasing costs, but ultimately, the regulators and designers need to choose what class of events the plant needs to survive (1000 year? 100000 year? Direct strike by a large meteorite?). The mass media and public need to do their part by not engaging in hysteria over OMG RADIATION! (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose</a>).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rob Timmerman, post: 24065, member: 172"] Re: Attempting to bring clarity to the nuclear problems facing Japan Excellent summary, Phil. For those looking for some more background on the pros and cons of some of the different containment designs, check out this memo from the AEC [url]http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/greeninc/hanauer.pdf[/url] For some perspective, consider that this is a 40+ year old power station. If this were a coal or hydro plant with the same generating capacity, there likely would have been similar (if not worse) damage and loss of life. Making a generating station arbitrarily safe is an exercise in risk analysis and design, with exponentially increasing costs, but ultimately, the regulators and designers need to choose what class of events the plant needs to survive (1000 year? 100000 year? Direct strike by a large meteorite?). The mass media and public need to do their part by not engaging in hysteria over OMG RADIATION! (see [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose[/url]). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Attempting to bring clarity to the nuclear problems facing Japan
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!