Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlie McGee" data-source="post: 115692" data-attributes="member: 6656"><p>Re: New Midas M32 Console</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Jason, you're right, but in this case there were over 3 independant validations of Behringer's theory. Not just the court, but also more than one expert witness and a U.S. patent examiner who granted Behringer their own patent. Who do you believe should settle a dispute like this? </p><p></p><p>Seriously, if all of the emotions are stripped from this matter here's what we have: Peavey thought JR's patent was copied. Behringer thought that they had an original invention. A judge, expert witnesses, and a US patent examiner all agreed with Behringer's position that there was no copying and he was permitted to take his invention to the marketplace. I find it odd that people disagree with me on the Behringer matter. It isn't my opinion. It's just the facts. Here's the thing-- people can disagree with me and dislike me forever. It won't change the facts. When it comes to the dispute, Behringer won, got their patent and sold their product. Everything else is hurt feelings, reputation, rumors, and wishful thinking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlie McGee, post: 115692, member: 6656"] Re: New Midas M32 Console Jason, you're right, but in this case there were over 3 independant validations of Behringer's theory. Not just the court, but also more than one expert witness and a U.S. patent examiner who granted Behringer their own patent. Who do you believe should settle a dispute like this? Seriously, if all of the emotions are stripped from this matter here's what we have: Peavey thought JR's patent was copied. Behringer thought that they had an original invention. A judge, expert witnesses, and a US patent examiner all agreed with Behringer's position that there was no copying and he was permitted to take his invention to the marketplace. I find it odd that people disagree with me on the Behringer matter. It isn't my opinion. It's just the facts. Here's the thing-- people can disagree with me and dislike me forever. It won't change the facts. When it comes to the dispute, Behringer won, got their patent and sold their product. Everything else is hurt feelings, reputation, rumors, and wishful thinking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!