Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 115717" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: New Midas M32 Console</p><p></p><p></p><p>Those findings are a matter of record and not in dispute. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Peavey invented and filed a patent for FLS trying to protect it from being copied and Behringer managed to legally knock-off that very successful product. Peavey sued to defend what it believed it had secured patent protection for. The court sided with Behringer. </p><p></p><p>It is obviously clever business to knock off other company's successful products if you can. Parsing the narrow legal definitions about what is or is not a "legal" copy, means less than what is right and wrong to the court of public opinion. What actually happened is apparent to any who were active in the industry at the time. </p><p></p><p>i view this as a matter of principle and ethics, not just what is legal. I also consider this ancient history. All this legal nit picking will not change my personal recollection of events that I lived. </p><p></p><p>JR</p><p></p><p>[edit- I did not see Joe's post before I posted this, so I am not responding to his specific comments. /edit]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 115717, member: 126"] Re: New Midas M32 Console Those findings are a matter of record and not in dispute. Peavey invented and filed a patent for FLS trying to protect it from being copied and Behringer managed to legally knock-off that very successful product. Peavey sued to defend what it believed it had secured patent protection for. The court sided with Behringer. It is obviously clever business to knock off other company's successful products if you can. Parsing the narrow legal definitions about what is or is not a "legal" copy, means less than what is right and wrong to the court of public opinion. What actually happened is apparent to any who were active in the industry at the time. i view this as a matter of principle and ethics, not just what is legal. I also consider this ancient history. All this legal nit picking will not change my personal recollection of events that I lived. JR [edit- I did not see Joe's post before I posted this, so I am not responding to his specific comments. /edit] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!