Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arik Semagin" data-source="post: 116059" data-attributes="member: 5072"><p>Re: Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Per, the truth I think is somewhere in between: even though ALTO small format mixers are very similar to Behringer and Mackie mixers on outside (small CR and CFX), it's hard to tell at what extent these designs are copied, because these small mixers are so basic in nature! If there are no patent protection (or adequate protection), then nothing can prevent competitors from copying some or all design elements. Internal circuitry may be slightly different, the sound quality can be as well, but the basic functionality and controls remains the same. It's common for designers to examine competitors' products to the last detail before creating their own (why invent a bicycle?), so it may be hard to draw a line between "copied design" and "implemented idea", in any industry.</p><p></p><p>I think Behringer still has competitive advantage over others due to his own factory in China where he has better control over costs and quality. In other words, he may have more room to play (can cut prices and still remain profitable). But he may not have to go lower, if Behringer products will be better (in both performance and reliability)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arik Semagin, post: 116059, member: 5072"] Re: Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion Per, the truth I think is somewhere in between: even though ALTO small format mixers are very similar to Behringer and Mackie mixers on outside (small CR and CFX), it's hard to tell at what extent these designs are copied, because these small mixers are so basic in nature! If there are no patent protection (or adequate protection), then nothing can prevent competitors from copying some or all design elements. Internal circuitry may be slightly different, the sound quality can be as well, but the basic functionality and controls remains the same. It's common for designers to examine competitors' products to the last detail before creating their own (why invent a bicycle?), so it may be hard to draw a line between "copied design" and "implemented idea", in any industry. I think Behringer still has competitive advantage over others due to his own factory in China where he has better control over costs and quality. In other words, he may have more room to play (can cut prices and still remain profitable). But he may not have to go lower, if Behringer products will be better (in both performance and reliability) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Copyright, Patent, General Intellectual Property Discussion (Branch from M32 Thread)
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!