Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Danley SM80 and others shootout Monday January 14 at Danley in Gainesville, GA.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 75845" data-attributes="member: 30"><p>Re: Danley SM80 and others shootout Monday January 14 at Danley in Gainesville, GA.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That is why percussive instruments/recording make good test signals. How well does the loudspeaker/system produce a nice "sharp" attack? Does it sound "dull" or smeared.</p><p></p><p>It was real interesting at WFX with the 13 systems that were there. On some tracks on some systems the sound was a bit "masked", while on others it was nice and sharp.</p><p>Yet on other tracks (that didn't have sharp attacks), you didn't hear that kind of difference.</p><p></p><p>How a loudspeaker reacts over time (ie how many different arrivals you get) can make a big difference. Especially on the clarity side of things.</p><p></p><p>Historically speech inteligibility was measured in ALCONS (Articulation Loss of CONSonants). Which are the "sharper" attach parts of speech. The vowels are lower in freq-and are stronger in level-but add little to the overall clarity. If the sound was smeared in time (either by the sound system or the room), the clarity goes down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 75845, member: 30"] Re: Danley SM80 and others shootout Monday January 14 at Danley in Gainesville, GA. That is why percussive instruments/recording make good test signals. How well does the loudspeaker/system produce a nice "sharp" attack? Does it sound "dull" or smeared. It was real interesting at WFX with the 13 systems that were there. On some tracks on some systems the sound was a bit "masked", while on others it was nice and sharp. Yet on other tracks (that didn't have sharp attacks), you didn't hear that kind of difference. How a loudspeaker reacts over time (ie how many different arrivals you get) can make a big difference. Especially on the clarity side of things. Historically speech inteligibility was measured in ALCONS (Articulation Loss of CONSonants). Which are the "sharper" attach parts of speech. The vowels are lower in freq-and are stronger in level-but add little to the overall clarity. If the sound was smeared in time (either by the sound system or the room), the clarity goes down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Danley SM80 and others shootout Monday January 14 at Danley in Gainesville, GA.
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!