Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dave briar" data-source="post: 133397" data-attributes="member: 7650">Re: Digital layouts for analog guysI assume that my X32 doesn&#039;t provide this latency compensation either -- correct?&nbsp; This is interesting as I&#039;ve been sending all vocals both to main L/R directly and also to a subgroup, squashing the subgroup pretty good, and then routing that to L/R as well&nbsp; -- my version of parallel (New York?) compression.&nbsp; Given these are vocals and not rim shots I can&#039;t discern the added latency but from what is being said here I may be (am?) creating comb filtering (interference) in the overall vocal output?&nbsp; As an alternative if I were to route individual vocal inputs to two separate channels then squash only one of them and route both of those to L/R I would avoid this as both paths would be of equal length?&nbsp; I could then assign one DCA to control all of the squashed channels and thereby maintain a single fader for that action.&nbsp; Yes?&nbsp; Or am I off base as usual?&nbsp; &nbsp; ...dave</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dave briar, post: 133397, member: 7650"] Re: Digital layouts for analog guys I assume that my X32 doesn't provide this latency compensation either -- correct? This is interesting as I've been sending all vocals both to main L/R directly and also to a subgroup, squashing the subgroup pretty good, and then routing that to L/R as well -- my version of parallel (New York?) compression. Given these are vocals and not rim shots I can't discern the added latency but from what is being said here I may be (am?) creating comb filtering (interference) in the overall vocal output? As an alternative if I were to route individual vocal inputs to two separate channels then squash only one of them and route both of those to L/R I would avoid this as both paths would be of equal length? I could then assign one DCA to control all of the squashed channels and thereby maintain a single fader for that action. Yes? Or am I off base as usual? ...dave [/QUOTE]

Verification