I have since moved on to a real industry. I'm sorry I don't have time to indulge the forum members with tales of minutia related to the sound business. If I was still doing sound, I would probably care more. I did notice, however, that all of the name calling and crying that took place in the other forum which was directed at me actually got me more gigs based me "being that guy" from the forums who "stood up to all those [expletive deleted]."
At my last full time AV gig, I came upon an understanding of the true nature of the tour/high end AV industry. It was simply my intent to share it with people who are not trapped in a self-reinforcing mass delusion that they can rise to the top of the world just by "working hard" or doing some other nonsense found in 'get rich quick' books. The sound business contains a duality that assists in the elucidation of the lives of the people participating in it. Some use it to feel special, some use it to get laid, some use it to fulfill some emotional attachment to the touring culture or to fill a hole in ones otherwise irrelevant life. The sound industry is not and has never been an appurtenance of any economic model from a purely dollars and sense standpoint. This self reinforcing histrionic existence makes it impossible for people doing sound to entirely separate their emotional needs from the business (or should I say obsession) they continue to seek within the sound industry.
nevertheless, good luck displacing Clair Bros by "working hard" 8)~~
The live sound industry is mostly just a playground for rich people who want to feel like their in the band/part of the band/connected By the way, I read the bio for rat sound. It sounds like the "x" factor in that case was that they EXISTED AT ALL in the early 80's. Its easy to be successful at sound when you are literally the only tour sound company in the entire state at the time and you make your own stuff. This is exactly like what happened in the 50's when the american auto industry was on top, they were on top because the Americans bombed every other countries auto industry in ww2 and the U.S. had the only cars in the entire world...you think the auto industry might have been successful at that time? I bet there were lots of stories about how every single one of those companies started from a single nickel in a garage as well.
So, now back to the sound business. We have what is referred to as a "mature industry" with high barriers to entry. When every single company mentioned (note how there are only about 5 total) started, they got their start because there wasn't anything else and they had a monopoly. Success is easy when you have a monopoly--or like I said, when you just happened to be born at the right time in history.
To quote Shakespeare:
"(it is) a tale: told by an idiot, full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing....."
Well, Leaders always need followers....The leaders, could probably make a living in ANY business.
Hammer
Exactly, the live concert sound industry is a rather tilted place from a business standpoint. I'm not sure the industry would exist (certainly not like it is) if there weren't people willing to do all kinds of crazy work for very little monetary reward. Some people are willing to work for less than an honest wage because of the fun and exciting nature of the job. For some this only lasts till the first load out but among those that last long enough to understand what the job entails we end up with some people who are willing to not only work but sacrifice incredibly to live the sound dude life because they've fallen in love with it.Bennett said:A large initial investment does not equate with profitability, especially in a business where 1-3% ROI is the norm.
Well, Leaders always need followers....
Thought #17: A lot of the successful firms started out with a partnership of at least 2 sound dudes. Clair and Rat are both examples of this.
Thought #9: It's been my assumption that the sound companies as well as the sound dudes that work with the biggest names generally started out at the ground level with a musical act that in turn worked it's way up the ladder. Somebody mentioned what Evan is doing and I think his is a very good example. If not for the success of the band he's touring with, he likely wouldn't be touring at the level he is. I think that success in the touring concert industry is often about being good at picking acts that will go somewhere commercially. That or being lucky enough that one of the no-name bands that you work with takes off.
Thought #4: By now we've all read Outliers and other books of its ilk (right?) so we're already aware that outstanding success is a combination of hard work and chance. I still hold onto the values that were instilled in me as a pup to work hard, be honest and strive for excellence but, I think I do sometimes get a dose of the same "poison" that Mr. Duffin is being associated with. I think the math shows that the ones who really end up standing out in a particular field had opportunities that the others didn't. Would the Clair brothers have been so successful if their father was a grocery store clerk instead of a grocery store owner? I wouldn't want to discount the value of the business education that they were exposed to from a very young age as well as a number of other unknown "advantages". Seeing others around you succeed where you seem to be failing can be a tough reminder that success could very well be out of your hands. But that is a good moment to reread the JBL story for if you give up, you more than likely forfeit any payoff of your hard work.
Quite quite. After my post I realized it would have been good to put in a qualifier that he would likely not be soaring this high this soon if not for a band that has done well very quickly. And again, it's just my observation of the industry - Sound companies and sound dudes do well when their clients do well. As far as picking, certainly the bands sometimes choose their sound dudes (if management doesn't do it for them) but the dude also chooses who he wants to work with. After all, there's only one Friday night a week...Hello Drew et al,
While Evan was used as an example...I feel it is unfair to say that "If not for the success of the band..." ... I disagree, and that's a presumptive statement which minimizes his achievements and knowledge. I feel that Evan would and could do anything he sets as a goal. My own experiences with him assure me that he not only likes what he's doing, but his drive to learn also indicates that it's his passion. The biggest ommission on someone's part ...is forgetting that, the Group picked HIM to be be THEIR Sound guy. On their way up the ladder, the Group could've chosen many other highly qualifed people to perform the task, but, they picked him and have STAYED with him.
Quite quite. After my post I realized it would have been good to put in a qualifier that he would likely not be soaring this high this soon if not for a band that has done well very quickly. And again, it's just my observation of the industry - Sound companies and sound dudes do well when their clients do well. As far as picking, certainly the bands sometimes choose their sound dudes (if management doesn't do it for them) but the dude also chooses who he wants to work with. After all, there's only one Friday night a week...
Absolutely true, consistent, persistent work is a necessity for success.One very important thing that I didn't mention, is in regards to some named Sound Companies & their owners... They didn't achieve success over night. It took years of CONSISTANT serving of their customers. Some supplied their gear to specific groups when others wouldn't even bid the gigs.
Anyway... I hope that everyone can/will achieve their goal. But remember, sometimes what we want and what we need are two different things.
Cheers,
Hammer