Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 123353" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: Listening Get TogetherA sad reminder of the state of the patent office. It is generally too easy to get a patent awarded (it must be I have 9 <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> ). They generally just do a search for similar &quot;language&quot;. I doubt there is much prior speaker art talking about &quot;vortex&quot; technology. The PTO is comfortable letting the courts sort out the bad patents from good, but this often results in the golden ruling (deep pockets win)..I can imagine lawyers and the court system having a field day with this, if anybody is crazy enough to prosecute this. I do not find the courts a good place to parse technical matters.&nbsp; JR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 123353, member: 126"] Re: Listening Get Together A sad reminder of the state of the patent office. It is generally too easy to get a patent awarded (it must be I have 9 :-) ). They generally just do a search for similar "language". I doubt there is much prior speaker art talking about "vortex" technology. The PTO is comfortable letting the courts sort out the bad patents from good, but this often results in the golden ruling (deep pockets win).. I can imagine lawyers and the court system having a field day with this, if anybody is crazy enough to prosecute this. I do not find the courts a good place to parse technical matters. JR [/QUOTE]

Verification