Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 123371" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: Listening Get TogetherPONO appears to be a solution in search of a problem. Sampling theory and quantization rates are mature technology that was well vetted by mass market&nbsp; consumer audio, (think Phillips and Sony with the CD, not some musos and studio types). Over the decades since the CD there have been naysayers trying to market higher resolution solutions, the market has not only rejected them all but has gravitated to the even lower resolution than CD media (MP3 et al) to reduce bandwidth requirements.&nbsp; Studio recording can justify the highest resolution available for archival purposes. In a free mass market PONO will get exactly the response it deserves. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> JR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 123371, member: 126"] Re: Listening Get Together PONO appears to be a solution in search of a problem. Sampling theory and quantization rates are mature technology that was well vetted by mass market consumer audio, (think Phillips and Sony with the CD, not some musos and studio types). Over the decades since the CD there have been naysayers trying to market higher resolution solutions, the market has not only rejected them all but has gravitated to the even lower resolution than CD media (MP3 et al) to reduce bandwidth requirements. Studio recording can justify the highest resolution available for archival purposes. In a free mass market PONO will get exactly the response it deserves. :-) JR [/QUOTE]

Verification