Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Listening Get Together
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doug Hart" data-source="post: 82009" data-attributes="member: 3721"><p>Re: Listening Get Together</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>It wont work??? Crap !!! I guess we'll just scrap everything and quit then. Dangit... I thought it would work.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">I<em><span style="font-size: 10px">n his 1842 book </span></em></span></span><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><a href="http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/comte/" target="_blank">The Positive Philosophy</a><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">, the French philosopher Auguste Comte wrote of the stars: "We can never learn their internal constitution, nor, in regard to some of them, how heat is absorbed by their atmosphere." In a similar vein, he said of the planets: "We can never know anything of their chemical or mineralogical structure; and, much less, that of organized beings living on their surface."</span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">The number of scientists and engineers who confidently stated that heavier-than-air flight was impossible in the run-up to the </span></span><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17823976.100-first-flight-the-wright-brothers-and-the-invention-of-the-airplane-by-t-a-heppenheimer-and-other-books.html" target="_blank">Wright brothers' flight</a><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"> is too large to count. Lord Kelvin is probably the best-known. In 1895 he stated that "heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible", only to be proved definitively wrong just eight years later.</span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">On 29 December 1934, Albert Einstein was quoted in the </span></span><span style="font-family: 'arial'">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as saying, "There is not the slightest indication that [nuclear energy] will ever be obtainable.</span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Landing and moving about on the moon offers so many serious problems for human beings that it may take science another 200 years to lick them." -- Science Digest, 1948</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable tobreathe, would die of asphyxia." -- Dr. Dionysus Lardner, 1793-1859</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"What can be more palpably absurd than the prospect held out oflocomotives travelling twice the speed of stagecoaches?" -- Quarterly Review, 1825</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"I can accept the theory of relativity as little as I can accept theexistence of atoms and other such dogmas." -- Ernst Mach (1838-1916)</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"X-rays will prove to be a hoax." -- Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Flight by machines heavier than air is impractical and insignificant, ifnot utterly impossible." -- Simon Newcomb, Director, U.S. Naval Observatory, 1902</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"The resistance of air increases as the square of the speed and works asthe cube [of speed].... It is clear that with our present devices thereis no hope of aircraft competing for racing speed with either ourlocomotives or automobiles." -- William H. Pickering, Director, Harvard College Observatory, 1910</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"As far as sinking a ship with a bomb is concerned, you just can't do it." -- Rear Admiral Clark Woodward, 1939</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Since the 40-inch objective of the Yerkes refractor and the 200-inchmirror of the Palomar reflector have apparently reached the practicalconstruction limits for telescopes of their respective types, it isextremely doubtful if a greater light-gathering eye of either kind willever again be built." -- A. Frederick Collins, 1946</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"This foolish idea of shooting at the moon is an example of the absurdlength to which vicious specialization will carry scientists. To escapethe Earth's gravitation a projectile needs a velocity of 7 miles persecond. The thermal energy at this speed is 15,180 calories [per gram]. Hence the proposition appears to be basically impossible" -- A. W. Bickerton, 1926</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"I am bold enough to say that a man-made Moon voyage will never occur regardless of all scientific advances." -- Lee De Forest, "the father of electronics"</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Fooling around with alternating currents is just a waste of time. Nobodywill use it, ever. It's too dangerous. . . it could kill a man as quickas a bolt of lightning. Direct current is safe." -- Thomas Edison</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered asa means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy." -- Drillers who Edwin L. Drake tried to enlist to his project to drill for oil in 1859</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"No one will ever be able to measure nerve impulse speed." -- Johannes Muller, German Physiologist, 1846</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from theintrusion of the wise and humane surgeon". -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon-Extraordinary to Queen Victoria, 1873</span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px">"Everything that can be invented has been invented." -- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><strong>Many, many things were thought to be impossible... until someone did it.</strong></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doug Hart, post: 82009, member: 3721"] Re: Listening Get Together [B]It wont work??? Crap !!! I guess we'll just scrap everything and quit then. Dangit... I thought it would work.[/B] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=arial]I[I][SIZE=2]n his 1842 book [/SIZE][/I][/FONT][/COLOR][I][SIZE=2][URL="http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/comte/"]The Positive Philosophy[/URL][COLOR=#000000][FONT=arial], the French philosopher Auguste Comte wrote of the stars: "We can never learn their internal constitution, nor, in regard to some of them, how heat is absorbed by their atmosphere." In a similar vein, he said of the planets: "We can never know anything of their chemical or mineralogical structure; and, much less, that of organized beings living on their surface." The number of scientists and engineers who confidently stated that heavier-than-air flight was impossible in the run-up to the [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17823976.100-first-flight-the-wright-brothers-and-the-invention-of-the-airplane-by-t-a-heppenheimer-and-other-books.html"]Wright brothers' flight[/URL][COLOR=#000000][FONT=arial] is too large to count. Lord Kelvin is probably the best-known. In 1895 he stated that "heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible", only to be proved definitively wrong just eight years later. On 29 December 1934, Albert Einstein was quoted in the [/FONT][/COLOR][FONT=arial]Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as saying, "There is not the slightest indication that [nuclear energy] will ever be obtainable.[/FONT] "Landing and moving about on the moon offers so many serious problems for human beings that it may take science another 200 years to lick them." -- Science Digest, 1948 "Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable tobreathe, would die of asphyxia." -- Dr. Dionysus Lardner, 1793-1859 "What can be more palpably absurd than the prospect held out oflocomotives travelling twice the speed of stagecoaches?" -- Quarterly Review, 1825 "I can accept the theory of relativity as little as I can accept theexistence of atoms and other such dogmas." -- Ernst Mach (1838-1916) "X-rays will prove to be a hoax." -- Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895 "Flight by machines heavier than air is impractical and insignificant, ifnot utterly impossible." -- Simon Newcomb, Director, U.S. Naval Observatory, 1902 "The resistance of air increases as the square of the speed and works asthe cube [of speed].... It is clear that with our present devices thereis no hope of aircraft competing for racing speed with either ourlocomotives or automobiles." -- William H. Pickering, Director, Harvard College Observatory, 1910 "As far as sinking a ship with a bomb is concerned, you just can't do it." -- Rear Admiral Clark Woodward, 1939 "Since the 40-inch objective of the Yerkes refractor and the 200-inchmirror of the Palomar reflector have apparently reached the practicalconstruction limits for telescopes of their respective types, it isextremely doubtful if a greater light-gathering eye of either kind willever again be built." -- A. Frederick Collins, 1946 "This foolish idea of shooting at the moon is an example of the absurdlength to which vicious specialization will carry scientists. To escapethe Earth's gravitation a projectile needs a velocity of 7 miles persecond. The thermal energy at this speed is 15,180 calories [per gram]. Hence the proposition appears to be basically impossible" -- A. W. Bickerton, 1926 "I am bold enough to say that a man-made Moon voyage will never occur regardless of all scientific advances." -- Lee De Forest, "the father of electronics" "Fooling around with alternating currents is just a waste of time. Nobodywill use it, ever. It's too dangerous. . . it could kill a man as quickas a bolt of lightning. Direct current is safe." -- Thomas Edison "This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered asa means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876 "Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy." -- Drillers who Edwin L. Drake tried to enlist to his project to drill for oil in 1859 "No one will ever be able to measure nerve impulse speed." -- Johannes Muller, German Physiologist, 1846 "The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from theintrusion of the wise and humane surgeon". -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon-Extraordinary to Queen Victoria, 1873 "Everything that can be invented has been invented." -- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899[/SIZE] [B]Many, many things were thought to be impossible... until someone did it.[/B] [/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Listening Get Together
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!