Re: Listening Get Together
It seems like it comes down to three basic missing pieces of information:
1) Measured performance data from a reputable source.
2) Listening impressions from unbiased, reputable sources not directly involved in the manufacture, distribution or sales of the products.
3) An explanation of the technology involved or admission that there is no explanation. When you claim something to be revolutionary or to break from already established physics then a pseudoscientific description is not going to be well received and also makes Items 1 and 2 that much more necessary and valuable.
Promoting a product here without already having such information to present has probably not helped either but I don't think this discussion will go anywhere positive without addressing some or all of these three issues.
