Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

Jan 10, 2011
903
4
18
Abingdon, MD
www.harfordsound.com
Well, as some of you guys know, I picked up a ''small'' self powered PA to handle my local shows. My goals with this system were easy ins & outs, lightweight, loud and good sounding.

I explored many options. Everything Guitar Center carried, some recommendations here from the LAB and even some older powered stuff no longer in production. The Mackie HD series caught my eye early on, and I was skeptical at best. Mackie hasn't had the best track record, and their powered speakers seemed to have fallen behind the times.

I had a solid day of demoing gear at Guitar Center. We used my tracks to listen to with nothing in line other then a Mackie Onyx. I listened to the JBL and QSC offerings, as well as a few other powered boxes. The Mackie was the only powered speaker at Guitar Center that wasn't a toy. I also listened to the EV ZX5a, and RCF offerings. Neither impressed me.

So, I settled for a small Mackie rig of 2 HD1531 tops, and 2 HD1801 subs.

The form factor of the cabs are great. The HD1531 is way smaller then the QSC and JBL boxes, and looks a lot more ''pro.'' The HD1801 sub is a cube, and easy enough to move. I can get the HD1531 & 1801 into my truck alone, but I need another person to get the tops on a pole. Build quality is top notch too. They're made from real wood, and have a tough finish on them. They've got a bunch of fly points as well.

So, let's get on to the testing. First, some SMAART traces I took today. It should be noted that all measurements were in the ground plane.

HD1531:

HD1531.png


The Orange trace is with the EQ in the flat position. The blue track was with the hi-shelf on the box turned to +3.

HD1801:

HD1801.png


Full system:

fullrange.png


I didn't really care too much about the full range response, but rather how the boxes played together at the crossover point. The green trace is with both boxes running full range. There was a noticeable dip at 160hz, as well as the overall ''fullness'' of the LF. But, when the top was high passed via the 1801's output, things smoothed way out and sounded much better(purple).

Alright, so how's it sound? Unfortunately, due to poor weather today, I had to move indoors to do my listening tests. I took 2 subs, 1 top and fired up the system. First, I just wanted to hear how the boxes sounded. No EQ, straight from my console to the speakers. I played some familiar tracks and right away the 200hz bump SMAART showed me was noticeable. No problem, I took the mid sweepable EQ on the back of the box, and cut it 3dB. Problem gone! I also took the high shelf and turned it to +3dB for some extra sparkle. It should be noted that the EQ on these boxes is DSP based!

So basic listening after a little EQ, here's my notes on the tops:
-Very smooth sounding cabinets.
-Nice crisp top end, but not overbearing
-Detailed midrange, smooth, not honky at all.
-Solid low mids.

Overall, they're very nice sounding cabinets. I decided to push them up to limit to see how they reacted. First, I ran some pink noise until the limit light started to flash. As advertised, they will do 126dBC @ 1m. So, I grabbed some more test tracks, and cranked it up. I was expecting a red light after the yellow light, but I could not find one. Even so, they stayed very clean, and controlled all the way into solid limit. You can hear the limiters doing their job, but it's not bad sounding at all. Much much better then some other self powered boxes in the same price range.

Sub wise, Mackie finally learned how to build a sub. It packs a lot of punch for it's small size. Plenty of low extension, and a solid thump. They get loud, and stay clean all the way up to limit. If you try to push in the 35-40hz range you hit limit a lot faster and you can hear the drivers getting a little sloppy. But, other then that, they are very solid. Even into solid limit, they do not bottom out and they stay clean. I can hear some of the low lows go away as you push them harder, but it's not bad at all. For a single 18 self powered box under $1,000, you'll be hard pressed to find something better. You'll want 2 subs per 1 HD1531 though if you like a lot of LF like me.

I was originally planing to drive the system with a DSP and do my EQ & HPF/LPF's in it, but after playing with the system today, I decided that all I need is a graphic EQ at FOH for some minor tweaks during the show. Everything else is already done for me.

Overall, you'll be hard pressed to find something better for the money. I bought 2 subs and 2 tops for well under $4,000, and everything was brand new in the box. These make all other self powered speakers in this price range look like toys. I would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone. Mackie finally got their shit together and came out with a great box, thanks to EAW.

I'm going to be putting these guys through their paces over the coming weeks, and I will report back.

Evan
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

I was overwhelmed with the urge to rip into these Mackie's today, so here you have it.



First, is the HD1531:

IMG_1243.jpg






Mackie did a good job packing a lot into a little space.



IMG_1248.jpg


IMG_1251.jpg






I pulled the 15 out, and was surprised to see the amp in a completely different chamber than the drivers. Cool design feature. Lots of bracing inside. The mid range driver was in a sealed chamber, separate from the rest of the drivers. All of the drivers were neo. I didn't want to rip into the MF/HF section, as it just seemed like too much work for today. Maybe next time!



IMG_1244.jpg


IMG_1246.jpg




The 15'' was a nice lightweight neo driver. No idea who makes it though.





And, the HD1801:



IMG_1254.jpg


IMG_1255.jpg


IMG_1258.jpg


IMG_1262.jpg








The 18'' was not a neo driver though. It was a heavy sucker, probably half the weight of the cab! Again, a nice build with plenty of bracing inside. Much smaller port then I was expecting though.









Evan
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

Robert Patch was kind enough to bring his PA along with his EV ZX5A's out today so that we could tune up his rig and do a mini ''Shootout.'' Hopefully he adds his comments in as well.

speakers-3.jpg


Before I start any comparisons, here's what the ZX5A looks like with no processing:

ZX5A.png


I probably could have smoothed out the phase response a little more, but it was cold and I wanted to be done at this point.

We started off first by just running the tops, full range with no processing at a low/moderate volume.

ZX5A:
-Nice top end sizzle.
-Smooth, detailed midrange.
-Decent bass response.
-Lots of vocal presence.

HD1531:
-Darker, almost ''dull'' top end.
-Very smooth midrange.
-Overall very smooth, flat sound.
-A little low mid heavy

Then we proceeded to crank them up.

ZX5A:
-Super bright, harsh top end.
-Very brittle and thin sounding
-Painful

HD1531:
-Surprisingly smooth!
-A few midrange peaks
-Still very full sounding

It was clear some EQ was needed on both cabinets. Here's what I ended up with:

ZX5A:
EQ 1: -2 @ 250hz, Q4
EQ 2: -3 @ 2.5k, Q5.2
EQ3: -5 @ 4k, Q2.2
EQ4: -4 @ 8k, Q6

HD1531:
EQ1: -2 @ 190hz, Q4
EQ2: -3 @ 5k, Q3
EQ3: +4 @ 9.6k, Hi Shelf

After some EQ, both boxes were much improved, however the ZX5A still fell apart at high SPL. The HF just simply fell apart. It was harsh to say the least. The box sounds great at low levels, but it needs a good bit of EQ to hold together at high volumes. The horn simply outruns the single 15, by a lot! I didn't have enough time to really dig into it and really EQ everything out, so I can't comment much else.

The HD1531 on the other hand held itself together very well at high SPL. Even as we ran into the limiters, it stayed clean, and solid. It has an ''in your face'' sound to it. It's not harsh, it's just right there. I did notice a little distortion on the 15'' on some of the bass heavy songs, but that was well into the limiters at that point. When running with a sub, there is no distortion.

And that's pretty much it. For the size/weight, the EV box is great. But, it's going to require a lot of extra EQ to really shine. The Mackie box is bigger, and heavier, but it sounds a lot better and holds together much better at high SPL.

We also did briefly listen to the QSC K10. I actually think it sounds better then it's bigger brother. The K10 needed some EQ as well because the horn was quite hot, but it's not a bad little utility box at all. It simply didn't have the get up and go that the ZX5A and HD1531 had, so we didn't include it in our tests.

The JTR Triple 12/Orbit Shifter were also part of the tests, but that's for another thread.


Evan
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

I have a show on Saturday, I could leave the stuff on the truck and we could do something Sunday.



Or your schedule is more impressive than mine, just let me know when you are in town.
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

As stated elsewhere on the web, I will echo Evan's sentiments toward the Mackie HD series.



I have been VERY impressed. These (HD1531 in particular) sound a lot more expensive than their price would indicate. They are no toy.
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

As stated elsewhere on the web, I will echo Evan's sentiments toward the Mackie HD series.



I have been VERY impressed. These (HD1531 in particular) sound a lot more expensive than their price would indicate. They are no toy.



My main concern is reliability. Mackie/Loud has been very suspect with quality control on many of their products. It seems whatever limiting they're setting up in a lot of their recent boxes isn't doing such a hot job of protecting HF drivers. I know the limiters in their older RCF built boxes are solid though. 10 years with four SRM450 and and 4 SR1530s and I have yet to have a driver or amp failure after really beating the shit out of them. There have been quite a few reports too about amps crapping out on power up or low output usage in their recent crop of self powered boxes. I'll be curious to see how the HD series holds up over time.



Greg
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

I don't disagree with your concerns Greg. That was a concern when picking these up. In fact when they arrived I had to open up an amp module and reseat some connectors. I presume it had a rough ride.

Since then, no issues for me. Then again, I'm not often doing metal gigs or pushing them heavily into limiting.

Hopefully Mackie will straighten out parts availability. I've had the caster kits for the HD1801's on order for 3 months now and they still are backordered. This has been Mackie's biggest flaw for me in recent years. I hope this improves. They claim to be making changes.
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

Evan,

Great report!

I've followed with great interest the development of the 3 way boxes that have come out lately. In particular I've been curious how the JBL Prx635 measures up to other boxes in this class/price range. It seems like the one to beat:

60 pounds vs 108? for the Mackie
$1,000 vs. $1200 for the Mackie

My main concern is finding a reasonable weight with a smooth midrange; I understand there are 2 ways out there in the pro class that can sound even smoother, but you could probably get two of these speakers for the price of one of those! I'm pre-disposed to believe a 3 way design, within a given class, is more likely to give you that smooth mid-range (just so you know what my prejudices are and what I'm looking for). I'm very sensitive in the 1-3k range of hearing and don't want to subject others to what sounds like harsh, shrill live sound!

The other interest is how well these speakers hold up on their own without a sub- of course a sub is the way to go, but in those instances where one isn't used, how well these boxes do.

I've read 1/2 dozen reports so far of the Prx635s, and so far the word is they sound remarkably good (esp. in the all important mid-range). One person had the opportunity to hear it with different bands and compare it to a similar sized 2-way box, and his comment was it didn't make much difference with heavy metal, but as you moved in musical styles towards acoustic and jazz styles, the difference was remarkable. That's what I wanted to hear!

Good to know the Mackies hold up at the peak of their output- that's probably where I was hearing the harshness in a lot of the live sound.

Thanks,
Randyman
 
Re: Mackie HD1531 & HD1801

After doing some comparative listening tests of the two way Mackie HD1521 against some good 8'' and 10'' cone mids, I was quite impressed. Source was an excellent guitar/player vocalist, who was standing in various positions, but the cabinet is very smooth, no feedback at full tilt boogie with him 25 feet in front.

Sounded good on and off axis, got loud, sounded good hard into the limiter.

Low end would be adequate without a sub for many types of music in small venues.
 
Up in smoke!

Well, I hate to bring bad news, but my initially very positive opinion of these is somewhat soured after today's experience.

Fired one up and it started immediately going into protect, with no input connected yet. Then sparks and smoke from the amp module and it tripped the breaker. It is dead. Nice.

There were no power issues and the other box on the same circuit was fine.

This is from a box that is not heavily used and never abused, travels with care etc. I'm glad I have other options soI'm not relying on these with no backup.

It's really a shame, they are excellent sounding boxes, but I'm always going to have "trust issues" with these going forward, which sucks.
 
Re: Up in smoke!

Well, I hate to bring bad news, but my initially very positive opinion of these is somewhat soured after today's experience.

Fired one up and it started immediately going into protect, with no input connected yet. Then sparks and smoke from the amp module and it tripped the breaker. It is dead. Nice.

There were no power issues and the other box on the same circuit was fine.

This is from a box that is not heavily used and never abused, travels with care etc. I'm glad I have other options soI'm not relying on these with no backup.

It's really a shame, they are excellent sounding boxes, but I'm always going to have "trust issues" with these going forward, which sucks.

Sorry to hear that Jeff. These were actually on my maybe list as I look to move into 2011 with my SOS stock.
 
Re: Up in smoke!

Well, I hate to bring bad news, but my initially very positive opinion of these is somewhat soured after today's experience.

Fired one up and it started immediately going into protect, with no input connected yet. Then sparks and smoke from the amp module and it tripped the breaker. It is dead. Nice.

There were no power issues and the other box on the same circuit was fine.

This is from a box that is not heavily used and never abused, travels with care etc. I'm glad I have other options soI'm not relying on these with no backup.

It's really a shame, they are excellent sounding boxes, but I'm always going to have "trust issues" with these going forward, which sucks.

I'm not defending Mackie. But if a Meyer Milo blows up, and it's a $10,000 box, does that mean Meyer is now bad and questionable? No. There are always going to be QC and parts quality issues no matter how hard anyone tries. There will even be design flaws, like in the case of the original Itechs. Hopefully, it won't keep happening, and you'll get quick and painless service (good luck with that :roll:).

When my Itechs blew up, I didn't immediately dismiss Crown as being a crap brand and switch to another. Instead, I judged the quality of the company by the customer service, not the one or two amps with issues. Now if getting decent service was impossible, that's a different story.
 
Last edited:
Re: Up in smoke!

I'm not defending Mackie. But if a Meyer Milo blows up, and it's a $10,000 box, does that mean Meyer is now bad and questionable? No. There are always going to be QC and parts quality issues no matter how hard anyone tries. There will even be design flaws, like in the case of the original Itechs. Hopefully, it won't keep happening, and you'll get quick and painless service (good luck with that :roll:).

When my Itechs blew up, I didn't immediately dismiss Crown as being a crap brand and switch to another. Instead, I judged the quality of the company by the customer service, not the one or two amps with issues. Now if getting decent service was impossible, that's a different story.

Crown/Meyer vs Mackie? Everything has it's purpose, but Mackie has had QC and service issues that have made me weary of many of their new products. Crown and Meyer's track record is a little better to say the least! Itech's were at the leading edge of technology so a few missteps might be overlooked (QSC had PFC issues too, but both companies are pretty well regarded). These speakers have had other issues reported elsewhere so it's not really an isolated incident. I wouldn't write them off, but it certainly makes them less appealing at this point in time. I know the internet can blow isolated issues out of proportion, but it can also steer you clear of troubled product lines or hold off buying until things are sorted out.

(FWIW, I was very confident buying IT HD's and PL380's)
 
Re: Up in smoke!

But if a Meyer Milo blows up, and it's a $10,000 box, does that mean Meyer is now bad and questionable? No. There are always going to be QC and parts quality issues no matter how hard anyone tries. There will even be design flaws, like in the case of the original Itechs.
The difference being that higher end companies (Meyer, L-Acoustics etc..) take care of these things quickly and professionally.
No call centers staffed by halfwits are involved.

Mackie is and will remain MI gear until they learn what customer service means.
 
Re: Up in smoke!

I'm not defending Mackie. But if a Meyer Milo blows up, and it's a $10,000 box, does that mean Meyer is now bad and questionable? No. There are always going to be QC and parts quality issues no matter how hard anyone tries. There will even be design flaws, like in the case of the original Itechs. Hopefully, it won't keep happening, and you'll get quick and painless service (good luck with that :roll:).

My issue isn't so much about the cab developing a problem, but the knowledge that I can't have access to a quick fix for the problem, which makes the cab having a problem a much bigger problem than it should need to be. Hopefully the turnaround this time will be faster than previous dealings with them........ :(

BTW, opening the amp module up, there is a lot of sloppy hot glue work, stringy bits are everywhere. Should've taken a photo. Don't know if that's necessarily a reflection of quality control, but it's certainly not something I've seen elsewhere to this degree.
 
Re: Up in smoke!

My issue isn't so much about the cab developing a problem, but the knowledge that I can't have access to a quick fix for the problem, which makes the cab having a problem a much bigger problem than it should need to be. Hopefully the turnaround this time will be faster than previous dealings with them........ :(

BTW, opening the amp module up, there is a lot of sloppy hot glue work, stringy bits are everywhere. Should've taken a photo. Don't know if that's necessarily a reflection of quality control, but it's certainly not something I've seen elsewhere to this degree.

I'd consider the presence of hot glue versus the alternative: none. At least they're trying to keep their components in place, rather than letting them snap off the board at will!

Of course, what separates the 'good' brands and the 'bad' ones is the total package: overall product performance, overall product construction, overall support and customer service, etc.

Mackie fails at least one of these categories.