Re: Need a louder dj monitor
I did a show a while back and at FOH (100' or so frfom the stage) I was measuring 118ish dB C slow and 128ish dB dB C Fast. When I went to impulse mode (a very fast response) I was getting around 136dB. So the system was actually producing 136dB peak-but the normal "fast" response time was measuring about 8dB less.
It seems you are VERY quick to jump on manufacturer specs-but you don't even use a meter to accurately measure the SPL.
There is nothing wrong with a calculated number-if it is based on real numbers.
Something ELSE that you probably have not taken into account is the actual measuring distance. If you measure to close to a cabinet-you will likely get a wrong number-because you are in the near field.
Many manufacturers measure at a distance away and then "back calculate" to the 1M number. This may not make any sense to you-but you have to realize WHY they do that and what the SPL number is supposed to be used for.
It is used to help determine how loud a particular cabinet will be at a particular distnace. Unless the number is based on something that can be used in the calculations-it is a "bad" number.
A good distance is 10M away. THen you add 20dB to the number measured (for the 20dB loss over that distance) and you get a usable number.
Now 10M may be a bit far-but 2-4 meters is a good number-for small boxes. At least to get closer than a 1M measurement will provide.
If you are going to jump on JBL for the bad numbers-then you need to measure other cabinets-IN THE SAME WAY WITH THE SAME METER. I bet you will find that all cabinets fall a bit short. SO then are you going to start to say the everybody is wrong-and YOU are correct?
You many find yourself on a very small island real quickly.
A normal "fast" response is not "fast enough" to measure the peaks.Rob,
Yeah i've tried just one cab before, that was how it was at first because I bought one MRX515 at a time, and it just wasn't loud enough. I also measured the spl with a class 2 meter, fast response (125ms) and C weighting with pink noise and also tried with a few types of music to give me a more real world reading at 1 metre from the grille and saw 119db, so I knew the 124db continuous spec from JBL's data sheet was fictional, plus it was calculated anyway so what do you expect, lol.
I did a show a while back and at FOH (100' or so frfom the stage) I was measuring 118ish dB C slow and 128ish dB dB C Fast. When I went to impulse mode (a very fast response) I was getting around 136dB. So the system was actually producing 136dB peak-but the normal "fast" response time was measuring about 8dB less.
It seems you are VERY quick to jump on manufacturer specs-but you don't even use a meter to accurately measure the SPL.
There is nothing wrong with a calculated number-if it is based on real numbers.
Something ELSE that you probably have not taken into account is the actual measuring distance. If you measure to close to a cabinet-you will likely get a wrong number-because you are in the near field.
Many manufacturers measure at a distance away and then "back calculate" to the 1M number. This may not make any sense to you-but you have to realize WHY they do that and what the SPL number is supposed to be used for.
It is used to help determine how loud a particular cabinet will be at a particular distnace. Unless the number is based on something that can be used in the calculations-it is a "bad" number.
A good distance is 10M away. THen you add 20dB to the number measured (for the 20dB loss over that distance) and you get a usable number.
Now 10M may be a bit far-but 2-4 meters is a good number-for small boxes. At least to get closer than a 1M measurement will provide.
If you are going to jump on JBL for the bad numbers-then you need to measure other cabinets-IN THE SAME WAY WITH THE SAME METER. I bet you will find that all cabinets fall a bit short. SO then are you going to start to say the everybody is wrong-and YOU are correct?
You many find yourself on a very small island real quickly.
Last edited by a moderator: