Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TJ Cornish" data-source="post: 100759" data-attributes="member: 162">Re: New line of StudioLive AI mixers announced.???&nbsp; Can you point to a poll of digital mixer designers to back this up?&nbsp; Lighting scenes are a little different in that with shows using hundreds of fixtures, other tools than simple faders have been developed to manage the many parameters, but even in lighting, moving faders are starting to appear. Let&#039;s get real here. The only reason Presonus didn&#039;t put moving faders on the StudioLive was cost. Yes, their no-layer approach mitigates that need somewhat; yes you can get a great mix on a StudioLive, but moving faders are better than non-moving faders, even as the StudioLive is implemented with no layers and lots of knobs. Now that the cost advantage has been eroded by the many X32 variants and the A&amp;H Qu-16, it is a harder sell to give up what have now become standard features - moving faders, recallable head amps, touch screens, etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TJ Cornish, post: 100759, member: 162"] Re: New line of StudioLive AI mixers announced. ??? Can you point to a poll of digital mixer designers to back this up? Lighting scenes are a little different in that with shows using hundreds of fixtures, other tools than simple faders have been developed to manage the many parameters, but even in lighting, moving faders are starting to appear. Let's get real here. The only reason Presonus didn't put moving faders on the StudioLive was cost. Yes, their no-layer approach mitigates that need somewhat; yes you can get a great mix on a StudioLive, but moving faders are better than non-moving faders, even as the StudioLive is implemented with no layers and lots of knobs. Now that the cost advantage has been eroded by the many X32 variants and the A&H Qu-16, it is a harder sell to give up what have now become standard features - moving faders, recallable head amps, touch screens, etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification