Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Max Warasila" data-source="post: 100798" data-attributes="member: 3845">Re: New line of StudioLive AI mixers announced.No, I can&#039;t, but it&#039;s the impression I&#039;ve gotten from my research into the history of consoles. I&#039;ll go back and do more research. I probably missed something.The lighting consoles of recent years are damn cool- the moving faders are impressive and so is the programming. But the implementation of moving faders is very different, and mostly used for assignable control, including in layers. Not saying it&#039;s the same as an audio console. Just saying that faders don&#039;t have to move for a product to be a quality console. And yes, that is the sole reason they didn&#039;t put them in, and at the time, they made money off the idea. I&#039;m not sure why they didn&#039;t make the jump to a completely different console, instead of just revamping their current line, but all power to them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Max Warasila, post: 100798, member: 3845"] Re: New line of StudioLive AI mixers announced. No, I can't, but it's the impression I've gotten from my research into the history of consoles. I'll go back and do more research. I probably missed something. The lighting consoles of recent years are damn cool- the moving faders are impressive and so is the programming. But the implementation of moving faders is very different, and mostly used for assignable control, including in layers. Not saying it's the same as an audio console. Just saying that faders don't [I]have[/I] to move for a product to be a quality console. And yes, that is the sole reason they didn't put them in, and at the time, they made money off the idea. I'm not sure why they didn't make the jump to a completely different console, instead of just revamping their current line, but all power to them. [/QUOTE]

Verification