Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New presonus mixer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dave briar" data-source="post: 130106" data-attributes="member: 7650"><p>Re: New presonus mixer</p><p></p><p></p><p>Scott, as I stated earlier, I'm near positive I couldn't hear any difference between 48 and 96KHz but, just to tap the extensive knowledge here, I seem to remember reading once (on the internet!) that modern compressors do a bit of "look ahead" to do their magic and given that wouldn't 96KHz give them a few more data points to look at than 48KHz? Or is that what you're accounting for in your statement that latency would be less with 96KHz ?</p><p></p><p> ..dave</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dave briar, post: 130106, member: 7650"] Re: New presonus mixer Scott, as I stated earlier, I'm near positive I couldn't hear any difference between 48 and 96KHz but, just to tap the extensive knowledge here, I seem to remember reading once (on the internet!) that modern compressors do a bit of "look ahead" to do their magic and given that wouldn't 96KHz give them a few more data points to look at than 48KHz? Or is that what you're accounting for in your statement that latency would be less with 96KHz ? ..dave [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New presonus mixer
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
