Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New presonus mixer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phil Graham" data-source="post: 130308" data-attributes="member: 430"><p>Re: New presonus mixer</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uwe,</p><p></p><p>Discussions in the context of measurement are a different animal than what Max was asking.</p><p></p><p>When looking at the phase behavior of a device under test (DUT), the total phase is the combination of the DUT's inherent phase response, and the phase that accrues due to time of flight from the DUT to the measuring transducer.</p><p></p><p>In the naive case, the arrival time alignment delay of the two signals that are used to calculate the transfer function (i.e. the input stimulus and the measured response) can only be controlled by buffering on the interval of one sample. This means that the phase calculated by the TF could be off due to the limited granularity of the delay time you can pick. <em>Note that this isn't a limitation of the math, but rather of one's ability to pick the alignment delay time for the signals fed to the transfer function</em>. If you could pick the delay time precisely, the phase would be known precisely.</p><p></p><p>There are more advanced techniques available that allow for inter-sample delay time choices, FWIW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phil Graham, post: 130308, member: 430"] Re: New presonus mixer Uwe, Discussions in the context of measurement are a different animal than what Max was asking. When looking at the phase behavior of a device under test (DUT), the total phase is the combination of the DUT's inherent phase response, and the phase that accrues due to time of flight from the DUT to the measuring transducer. In the naive case, the arrival time alignment delay of the two signals that are used to calculate the transfer function (i.e. the input stimulus and the measured response) can only be controlled by buffering on the interval of one sample. This means that the phase calculated by the TF could be off due to the limited granularity of the delay time you can pick. [I]Note that this isn't a limitation of the math, but rather of one's ability to pick the alignment delay time for the signals fed to the transfer function[/I]. If you could pick the delay time precisely, the phase would be known precisely. There are more advanced techniques available that allow for inter-sample delay time choices, FWIW. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New presonus mixer
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!