Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New Studiolive mixer at NAMM2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 148010" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: New Studiolive mixer at NAMM2016</p><p></p><p>To have an extra touch sensor (switch?) inside the fader that responds to touch is an extra expense, that might not be appreciated by all value conscious customers. </p><p></p><p>That said this could be handled inexpensively in software with the cheap motor-fader by recognizing when you have realized the finished fader move and release the motor control loop. The software could optionally recognize a fader change after being set and flag that for some use, or not. </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 148010, member: 126"] Re: New Studiolive mixer at NAMM2016 To have an extra touch sensor (switch?) inside the fader that responds to touch is an extra expense, that might not be appreciated by all value conscious customers. That said this could be handled inexpensively in software with the cheap motor-fader by recognizing when you have realized the finished fader move and release the motor control loop. The software could optionally recognize a fader change after being set and flag that for some use, or not. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
New Studiolive mixer at NAMM2016
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!