Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Ported enclosure poser!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David Morison" data-source="post: 214831" data-attributes="member: 2076"><p>Most port equations I've seen do take account of the number of ports, with larger numbers of smaller ports requiring slightly more length for a given tuning than fewer, larger ports (of equivalent cross sectional area).</p><p>Therefore, your split version may end up tuned fractionally higher than without the divider.</p><p>Also, if the undivided enclosure lacked sufficient bracing, the addition of the divider may help brace out any panel resonances.</p><p>Those are the only two effects I can think of.</p><p>FWIW,</p><p>David.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David Morison, post: 214831, member: 2076"] Most port equations I've seen do take account of the number of ports, with larger numbers of smaller ports requiring slightly more length for a given tuning than fewer, larger ports (of equivalent cross sectional area). Therefore, your split version may end up tuned fractionally higher than without the divider. Also, if the undivided enclosure lacked sufficient bracing, the addition of the divider may help brace out any panel resonances. Those are the only two effects I can think of. FWIW, David. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Ported enclosure poser!
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!