Normal
Re: Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability?Phil, sorry to hear you're having problems with the mixer. I thought that both the low mid and high mid bands of the Fat Channel processing had the "Hi Q" (Q of 2.0 versus that standard 0.55) switch, so are you saying that you'd like higher Q values for the current "Hi Q" option or that you'd also like the "Hi Q" option for the low and high bands where it is essentially replaced by being able to select those to be shelving filters? If fully variable bandwidth is not feasible then a wide/narrow/notch bandwidth selection would be nice but that would seem to require a hardware change.Have you played with the graphic EQs? They're a little different since the approach is not directly adjusting 31 fixed filters but rather using the user interface to create the desired equalization curve with the software then calculating how to best recreate that curve using 128 variable filters.
Re: Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability?
Phil, sorry to hear you're having problems with the mixer. I thought that both the low mid and high mid bands of the Fat Channel processing had the "Hi Q" (Q of 2.0 versus that standard 0.55) switch, so are you saying that you'd like higher Q values for the current "Hi Q" option or that you'd also like the "Hi Q" option for the low and high bands where it is essentially replaced by being able to select those to be shelving filters? If fully variable bandwidth is not feasible then a wide/narrow/notch bandwidth selection would be nice but that would seem to require a hardware change.
Have you played with the graphic EQs? They're a little different since the approach is not directly adjusting 31 fixed filters but rather using the user interface to create the desired equalization curve with the software then calculating how to best recreate that curve using 128 variable filters.
