Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phil Graham" data-source="post: 65364" data-attributes="member: 430"><p>Re: Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Infant mortality happens, and I see its potential as a fact of life for product at this price point quite possibly OEMed for Presonus. If it was a console for my personal day in and day out use, I would probably have returned to the Yamaha I know and trust. Many things about the use of the Presonus render it simpler than the Yamaha, as you know, and that's a central consideration here.</p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure the default Qs are 0.55 and 1.5 for "high Q". For mixing music I'd personally like those to be more like 1 and 3. For doing a talking head event more like 1.5 and 4+. I could live with changing them globally for a scene, but it would be even better to be able to define them on a per-channel basis.</p><p></p><p>I assume that filters are defined via biquads, so it should be doable via something like picking Qs in the VSL console, having VSL recalculate the filter coefficients, and then repopulating the coefficient lookup tables in the desk. I put in a detailed feature request with the Presonus folk suggesting this manner of approach.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've not played with the filter set yet, as there is a downstream DSP. I admit their filter approach is intriguing and I intend to put the results of their filter target system under analysis in SMAART when I get the console back from repair.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phil Graham, post: 65364, member: 430"] Re: Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability? Infant mortality happens, and I see its potential as a fact of life for product at this price point quite possibly OEMed for Presonus. If it was a console for my personal day in and day out use, I would probably have returned to the Yamaha I know and trust. Many things about the use of the Presonus render it simpler than the Yamaha, as you know, and that's a central consideration here. I'm pretty sure the default Qs are 0.55 and 1.5 for "high Q". For mixing music I'd personally like those to be more like 1 and 3. For doing a talking head event more like 1.5 and 4+. I could live with changing them globally for a scene, but it would be even better to be able to define them on a per-channel basis. I assume that filters are defined via biquads, so it should be doable via something like picking Qs in the VSL console, having VSL recalculate the filter coefficients, and then repopulating the coefficient lookup tables in the desk. I put in a detailed feature request with the Presonus folk suggesting this manner of approach. I've not played with the filter set yet, as there is a downstream DSP. I admit their filter approach is intriguing and I intend to put the results of their filter target system under analysis in SMAART when I get the console back from repair. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Presonus Studiolive Users - Reliability?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!