Re: Question concerning "end fire subs"
Per......
In this case it's both situations in one 10-hour day. Some of the styles require the kick-in-the-gut, some require the downward extension and harmonic support. I'd like to try the 3:1 cardioid, but that would require some ambitious re-wiring in my amp rack as the DX38 is 2 in/4 out. I'd have to use some splitters and another cross-over......but I do have another (analog) crossover in the rack as a spare.
We'll see.
I think a lot of the decision on what setup to use should be based on what it is that one wants the subs to do. If the main function of the subs is to give a kick the gut-wrenching quality that we crave, then a centre clustre/array is the thing. If the main function is to provide downward extension for several instruments, and the performance around crossover frequency is important, then it often makes sense to go with tops and subs together. It all depends on what frequency is most important, and wether considerations about power alley and stage volume are important or not.
Lykke til!!
Per......
In this case it's both situations in one 10-hour day. Some of the styles require the kick-in-the-gut, some require the downward extension and harmonic support. I'd like to try the 3:1 cardioid, but that would require some ambitious re-wiring in my amp rack as the DX38 is 2 in/4 out. I'd have to use some splitters and another cross-over......but I do have another (analog) crossover in the rack as a spare.
We'll see.