Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Smaart DI vs Systune Standard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bennett Prescott" data-source="post: 138974" data-attributes="member: 4"><p>Re: Smaart DI vs Systune Standard</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hey Ben,</p><p></p><p>Long time Smaart guy (well, not THAT long but maybe a decade) here. I have limited experience with Systune, to be honest, I have banged around in it a few times to see how it compares but never used it in anger.</p><p></p><p>What I like about Smaart, and version 7 is by far the best, is that it is written and supported by field engineers. So while it has very technical guts (there's more to building even a simple RTA than you might believe, and it's easier to get frequency binning wrong than you might think) the surface is designed for what I need it for: It lets me get good measurements very quickly. Smaart also has an active and extensive beta testing group who are constantly finding and documenting small inconsistencies that are probably not even seen by the majority of their users. The program definitely benefits from their regular training seminars as well, I think Smaart is exposed to more users in more situations than other software and so I find it can shine in more cases for me. In the end Smaart just works for me, for one mic or four, and while I could certainly spend a lot of time changing windows and IR sizes - the tools are there - it's the only software I have come to trust to get me data minutes after turning my laptop on and be done ASAP. In production that's worth every penny.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bennett Prescott, post: 138974, member: 4"] Re: Smaart DI vs Systune Standard Hey Ben, Long time Smaart guy (well, not THAT long but maybe a decade) here. I have limited experience with Systune, to be honest, I have banged around in it a few times to see how it compares but never used it in anger. What I like about Smaart, and version 7 is by far the best, is that it is written and supported by field engineers. So while it has very technical guts (there's more to building even a simple RTA than you might believe, and it's easier to get frequency binning wrong than you might think) the surface is designed for what I need it for: It lets me get good measurements very quickly. Smaart also has an active and extensive beta testing group who are constantly finding and documenting small inconsistencies that are probably not even seen by the majority of their users. The program definitely benefits from their regular training seminars as well, I think Smaart is exposed to more users in more situations than other software and so I find it can shine in more cases for me. In the end Smaart just works for me, for one mic or four, and while I could certainly spend a lot of time changing windows and IR sizes - the tools are there - it's the only software I have come to trust to get me data minutes after turning my laptop on and be done ASAP. In production that's worth every penny. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Smaart DI vs Systune Standard
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!