Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Smaart DI vs Systune Standard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 138997" data-attributes="member: 30"><p>Re: Smaart DI vs Systune Standard</p><p></p><p></p><p>When I started doing real measurements (15yrs ago), I would move the single mic around.</p><p></p><p>Then I build my "measurement cart" (which I still have and use). It had 8 rolls of different colored mic wire on it, a place for stand and a work platform. I was using Smaart 3.?? at the time.</p><p></p><p>I made little "level adjustment" adaptors that I then ran into a switch so I could place the mics around the room and simply turn a rotary switch to select the particular mic of interest. I would have to enter the delay time for each mic-but I would simply write it down so no big deal.</p><p></p><p>This worked for quite a while.</p><p></p><p>Then Systune came out. NOW I could run each mic into a a channel of a motu 8pre and see the different mics "overlayed" on the screen.</p><p></p><p>This was a huge improvement over the Smaart setup. </p><p></p><p>Then Smaart 7 came out. THIS is what I wanted and needed. Being able to see the ACTIVE trace of all of the mics at the same time was a HUGE improvement and time saver.</p><p></p><p>The particular tool that I use, depends on what I am doing. For lab work and data sheets I use TEF. But sadly I feel it will die out in my lifetime <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>But for "quick measurements" and system setup/alignment, Smaart 7 is my tool of choice. It is a rare day that I don't measure something with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 138997, member: 30"] Re: Smaart DI vs Systune Standard When I started doing real measurements (15yrs ago), I would move the single mic around. Then I build my "measurement cart" (which I still have and use). It had 8 rolls of different colored mic wire on it, a place for stand and a work platform. I was using Smaart 3.?? at the time. I made little "level adjustment" adaptors that I then ran into a switch so I could place the mics around the room and simply turn a rotary switch to select the particular mic of interest. I would have to enter the delay time for each mic-but I would simply write it down so no big deal. This worked for quite a while. Then Systune came out. NOW I could run each mic into a a channel of a motu 8pre and see the different mics "overlayed" on the screen. This was a huge improvement over the Smaart setup. Then Smaart 7 came out. THIS is what I wanted and needed. Being able to see the ACTIVE trace of all of the mics at the same time was a HUGE improvement and time saver. The particular tool that I use, depends on what I am doing. For lab work and data sheets I use TEF. But sadly I feel it will die out in my lifetime :( But for "quick measurements" and system setup/alignment, Smaart 7 is my tool of choice. It is a rare day that I don't measure something with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Smaart DI vs Systune Standard
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!