Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Guy Graham" data-source="post: 88288" data-attributes="member: 1944">Re: TH118vsSB1000zSorry if this is more of a JV question, but I often wonder when reading about such comparisons of different cabinets like this, why is there no apparent issue of unused box(es) acting as a passive radiator?I note mention of shorting the unused cab, but I didn&#039;t realise this electrical technique fully resolved the acoustic potential of the unused drivers and box tuning, preventing them affecting the measured result from the driven cabinet :?~:-?~:???:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Guy Graham, post: 88288, member: 1944"] Re: TH118vsSB1000z [FONT=arial][COLOR=#222222] [SIZE=3][SIZE=2]Sorry if this is more of a JV question, but I often wonder when reading about such comparisons of different cabinets like this, why is there no apparent issue of unused box(es) acting as a passive radiator? I note mention of shorting the unused cab, but I didn't realise this electrical technique fully resolved the acoustic potential of the unused drivers and box tuning, preventing them affecting the measured result from the driven cabinet[/SIZE] :?~:-?~:???:[/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification