Normal
Re: X16 PreviewI think you may have missed the point of the comments. Nobody seems to be negative about this as a sub $1,000 mixer for some applications, the comments seem to be expressing that it is not what the people here want and that calling it the "X16" may not be the best idea. For example, I don't expect AES50 or a digital snake capability for a sub $1k mixer, however I think not having it is a definite differentiator from the X32 and thus probably justifies this being a different product 'series'.Really, every segment of "the market"? As wide and varied as the markets represented here may be I'll have to disagree, but then I don't expect any manufacturer to be able to offer a solution for every potential situation or application.
Re: X16 Preview
I think you may have missed the point of the comments. Nobody seems to be negative about this as a sub $1,000 mixer for some applications, the comments seem to be expressing that it is not what the people here want and that calling it the "X16" may not be the best idea. For example, I don't expect AES50 or a digital snake capability for a sub $1k mixer, however I think not having it is a definite differentiator from the X32 and thus probably justifies this being a different product 'series'.
Really, every segment of "the market"? As wide and varied as the markets represented here may be I'll have to disagree, but then I don't expect any manufacturer to be able to offer a solution for every potential situation or application.
