Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dieter Edinger" data-source="post: 100000" data-attributes="member: 5147"><p>Probable bugs in X32-Edit (and console?)</p><p></p><p>As I'm new to this board I first would like to say "HELLO" to everybody and that I'm really impressed about the know how and tolerance in this board.</p><p></p><p>I don't own a X32 myself, but as soon as I have sold my analogue equipment and can afford this mixer I will be very happy to have one myself. For this reason I have tried to get used to all functions using X32-Edit (PC Version 1.10).</p><p></p><p>Now I think I found two bugs and wanted to know your opinions. </p><p></p><p>1.) Saving a matrix channel to a preset shows the wrong icon for active compressor</p><p>Each time a channel is saved in the library, it shows with different icons which channel sections have been active (eg. HA, Lowcut, Gate, EQ, Comp, etc.)</p><p>Everything is fine when a channel or mixbus is saved, but when a matrix is saved with an active compressor, the library shows the wrong icon (lowcut instead of comp although there is no lowcut for matrices)</p><p></p><p>2.) Sends on Fader for Subgroups?</p><p>From my analogue world I understand that the individual levels of the channels assigned to a subgroup are controlled with the channel faders and the subgroup fader controls the summed signal. In the X-32 Edit it is possible to engage the Sends on Fader also for subgroups and the channel faders move as they were assigned to a monitor feed. Shouldn't the faders remain at their individual position for subgroups as the channel level already determines the level sent to the subgroup? Either this way or it should not be possible to engage the send on faders for subgroups.</p><p></p><p>Do you have the same opinion on these two findings or am I completely wrong?</p><p>It would also be very kind if someone could try to reproduce this on the console, as I have none to test.</p><p></p><p>Thank you very much in advance for your answers!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dieter Edinger, post: 100000, member: 5147"] Probable bugs in X32-Edit (and console?) As I'm new to this board I first would like to say "HELLO" to everybody and that I'm really impressed about the know how and tolerance in this board. I don't own a X32 myself, but as soon as I have sold my analogue equipment and can afford this mixer I will be very happy to have one myself. For this reason I have tried to get used to all functions using X32-Edit (PC Version 1.10). Now I think I found two bugs and wanted to know your opinions. 1.) Saving a matrix channel to a preset shows the wrong icon for active compressor Each time a channel is saved in the library, it shows with different icons which channel sections have been active (eg. HA, Lowcut, Gate, EQ, Comp, etc.) Everything is fine when a channel or mixbus is saved, but when a matrix is saved with an active compressor, the library shows the wrong icon (lowcut instead of comp although there is no lowcut for matrices) 2.) Sends on Fader for Subgroups? From my analogue world I understand that the individual levels of the channels assigned to a subgroup are controlled with the channel faders and the subgroup fader controls the summed signal. In the X-32 Edit it is possible to engage the Sends on Fader also for subgroups and the channel faders move as they were assigned to a monitor feed. Shouldn't the faders remain at their individual position for subgroups as the channel level already determines the level sent to the subgroup? Either this way or it should not be possible to engage the send on faders for subgroups. Do you have the same opinion on these two findings or am I completely wrong? It would also be very kind if someone could try to reproduce this on the console, as I have none to test. Thank you very much in advance for your answers! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!