Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 100008" data-attributes="member: 3950"><p>Re: FX rack first 4 effects routing Question</p><p></p><p>- what is the difference in the Channel strip EQ between Veq and Peq?</p></blockquote><p></p><p>The shape for one, the Veq is wider at the same Q setting. Can't remember if there are any phase-differences between the two.[/QUOTE]</p><p></p><p>My engineering speculation is that the board is processing bound at 32 channels. There are some hints to this in that some of the more powerful efx are only available on FX slots 1 and 2 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> We may see more of this kind of non-symmetric processing in the future with V2 as Behringer engineering works to squeeze out more functionality from the old girl <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Keep in mind that as an engineer, you would have to account for the worst case condition where all 40 inputs are being used with every channel processor in use and all the buses are being used with all their channel processing being utilized along with the worst case computational FX combination being run all at the same time while having the max number of connected external devices controlling the mixer and all 32 in and 32 out recording interface running at the same time while someone pushed and pulled knobs and sliders at the same time. Now doesn't that sound like quite a bit of processing going on?</p><p></p><p>Personally Joe (and Behringer), I would institute a weight factor for each DSP algorithm on each processor and allow more and more processing to be engaged until the MIPS limit was reached. A simple UI could let the user see how much of their available processing power they had used. This approach would allow you to have some fairly serious processing added as long as you aren't doing the worst case in everything at the same time.</p><p></p><p>I think you have crammed in quite a bit already.</p><p></p><p>Maybe your engineers could consider this approach for V3 firmware ...... you know ..... with all their spare time <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 100008, member: 3950"] Re: FX rack first 4 effects routing Question - what is the difference in the Channel strip EQ between Veq and Peq?[/QUOTE] The shape for one, the Veq is wider at the same Q setting. Can't remember if there are any phase-differences between the two.[/QUOTE] My engineering speculation is that the board is processing bound at 32 channels. There are some hints to this in that some of the more powerful efx are only available on FX slots 1 and 2 ;) We may see more of this kind of non-symmetric processing in the future with V2 as Behringer engineering works to squeeze out more functionality from the old girl ;) Keep in mind that as an engineer, you would have to account for the worst case condition where all 40 inputs are being used with every channel processor in use and all the buses are being used with all their channel processing being utilized along with the worst case computational FX combination being run all at the same time while having the max number of connected external devices controlling the mixer and all 32 in and 32 out recording interface running at the same time while someone pushed and pulled knobs and sliders at the same time. Now doesn't that sound like quite a bit of processing going on? Personally Joe (and Behringer), I would institute a weight factor for each DSP algorithm on each processor and allow more and more processing to be engaged until the MIPS limit was reached. A simple UI could let the user see how much of their available processing power they had used. This approach would allow you to have some fairly serious processing added as long as you aren't doing the worst case in everything at the same time. I think you have crammed in quite a bit already. Maybe your engineers could consider this approach for V3 firmware ...... you know ..... with all their spare time ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!