Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tamas Tako" data-source="post: 115626" data-attributes="member: 2591">Re: X32 v2 RTAX32 simply can not remote controll right now the gain of the DL251. Neither the phantom power. Period.there is a remote controll software on KT&#039;&#039;s ftp site, which allows for PC remote controll all of the functions of the DL251 however.(i was not able to work with it, as the DL251 was not responding to the software somehow)i did a quick ABC listening test in our studio with a DL251 how it sounds in comparison to the onboard X32 mic preamps...all I can tell: even the Clock from DL251 (@48k) makes the system sound better, and the DL251 preamps are sounding also much better (much near to the quality of the reference signal) than the X32 onboard preamps. I think, this difference would be alone worth of the extra 2500 USD (for an M32) not to mention the pro series faders and the ergonomic design.of course this is my subjective experience.cheers,Tamas</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tamas Tako, post: 115626, member: 2591"] Re: X32 v2 RTA X32 simply can not remote controll right now the gain of the DL251. Neither the phantom power. Period. there is a remote controll software on KT''s ftp site, which allows for PC remote controll all of the functions of the DL251 however. (i was not able to work with it, as the DL251 was not responding to the software somehow) i did a quick ABC listening test in our studio with a DL251 how it sounds in comparison to the onboard X32 mic preamps... all I can tell: even the Clock from DL251 (@48k) makes the system sound better, and the DL251 preamps are sounding also much better (much near to the quality of the reference signal) than the X32 onboard preamps. I think, this difference would be alone worth of the extra 2500 USD (for an M32) not to mention the pro series faders and the ergonomic design. of course this is my subjective experience. cheers, Tamas [/QUOTE]

Verification