Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dan Mortensen" data-source="post: 121129" data-attributes="member: 2826">Re: S16 and phantom popsThe only evidence I have is how it works or doesn&#039;t work when I do it, and you&#039;re right, it is tedious to explain. In fact, it&#039;s so tedious, and I think the interested parties are so few, that someone else with 3 S16&#039;s connected can take over the explanations. I feel like the Preamps page solution is easy and straightforward to comprehend, while using the in-channel phantom button to set phantom on both the active and inactive S16&#039;s is confusing for me and seems like it will make needless work when the 2 S16&#039;s have totally different names and settings. It&#039;s nice that there&#039;s a second way, and anyone needing that function can make their own decision of how to get there, knowing there are two possibilities which will work and that the X32 system is just that much more flexible.I had to be gone today (using my Rack to provide sound for this meeting <a href="http://www.aes.org/sections/pnw/" target="_blank">The Pacific Northwest Section of the Audio Engineering Society - Devoted to the Art and Science of Audio</a> ), and feel in my rush to post before leaving that I put you in an awkward position with my earlier post, and I apologize for that. I realize you are not advocating any position over another, but merely stating how it can be done and what needs to be done to accomplish the task. I am saying that one method fits my workflow better than the other, but others can choose their own way and decide which is more intuitive for them.Thanks,Dan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dan Mortensen, post: 121129, member: 2826"] Re: S16 and phantom pops The only evidence I have is how it works or doesn't work when I do it, and you're right, it is tedious to explain. In fact, it's so tedious, and I think the interested parties are so few, that someone else with 3 S16's connected can take over the explanations. I feel like the Preamps page solution is easy and straightforward to comprehend, while using the in-channel phantom button to set phantom on both the active and inactive S16's is confusing for me and seems like it will make needless work when the 2 S16's have totally different names and settings. It's nice that there's a second way, and anyone needing that function can make their own decision of how to get there, knowing there are two possibilities which will work and that the X32 system is just that much more flexible. I had to be gone today (using my Rack to provide sound for this meeting [url=http://www.aes.org/sections/pnw/]The Pacific Northwest Section of the Audio Engineering Society - Devoted to the Art and Science of Audio[/url] ), and feel in my rush to post before leaving that I put you in an awkward position with my earlier post, and I apologize for that. I realize you are not advocating any position over another, but merely stating how it can be done and what needs to be done to accomplish the task. I am saying that one method fits my workflow better than the other, but others can choose their own way and decide which is more intuitive for them. Thanks, Dan [/QUOTE]

Verification