Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tim McCulloch" data-source="post: 123699" data-attributes="member: 67">Re: Rhythm DelayNo, Matt, you don&#039;t get it.&nbsp; I don&#039;t care if there is a &quot;better way&quot;.&nbsp; I want it to work the way every other tap tempo device has worked since 1988.&nbsp; It&#039;s a matter of work flow, which is a valid reason to want things a certain way.&nbsp; Making the average a user option shouldn&#039;t be some kind of Really Big Deal.Go back and re-read: Mr. Chiara puts its very succinctly.&nbsp; I don&#039;t care if averaging is &quot;better&quot; because averaging doesn&#039;t fit the reality of the work I have to do.&nbsp; If I can&#039;t retap the tempo when the guitarist comes in late or the drummer decides to speed up after the count off, the feature is pointless to me.&nbsp; Look at the complaints about the Scene management system and 100 scene limit:&nbsp; changes were made to accommodate customer needs and I submit that was much heavier lifting than making tap averaging switchable.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tim McCulloch, post: 123699, member: 67"] Re: Rhythm Delay No, Matt, you don't get it. I don't care if there is a "better way". I want it to work the way every other tap tempo device has worked since 1988. It's a matter of work flow, which is a valid reason to want things a certain way. Making the average a user option shouldn't be some kind of Really Big Deal. Go back and re-read: Mr. Chiara puts its very succinctly. I don't care if averaging is "better" because averaging doesn't fit the reality of the work I have to do. If I can't retap the tempo when the guitarist comes in late or the drummer decides to speed up after the count off, the feature is pointless to me. Look at the complaints about the Scene management system and 100 scene limit: changes were made to accommodate customer needs and I submit that was much heavier lifting than making tap averaging switchable. [/QUOTE]

Verification