Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gwynne Jones" data-source="post: 137211" data-attributes="member: 8779"><p>X32 ver 2.0 Effect Quality</p><p></p><p>I have searched this discussion thread and not found any discussion on this. I hope I'm not duplicating.</p><p></p><p>What are your opinions on the relative quality of the built in effects on the X32 compared to VSTs? I'm thinking regular VSTs; Waves, Cakewalk etc. Particularly the newer ver 2.0 effects like the 1176, the La2a and pultec EQs. I realize beauty is in the eye of the end of the tunnel - or whatever that expression is. But I'm looking for a more general 'they are vastly inferior to decent VSTs'; 'vastly superior'; 'pretty comparable'. </p><p></p><p>My reason for asking is that I have an X32, a few nice preamps, but no external compressor or EQ. I was thinking about getting a pair of compressors to lightly compress and color when tracking. If the FX rack effects on the X32 are comparable to solid VSTs then perhaps saving my hardware compressor money and using the X32 comps to track would make sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gwynne Jones, post: 137211, member: 8779"] X32 ver 2.0 Effect Quality I have searched this discussion thread and not found any discussion on this. I hope I'm not duplicating. What are your opinions on the relative quality of the built in effects on the X32 compared to VSTs? I'm thinking regular VSTs; Waves, Cakewalk etc. Particularly the newer ver 2.0 effects like the 1176, the La2a and pultec EQs. I realize beauty is in the eye of the end of the tunnel - or whatever that expression is. But I'm looking for a more general 'they are vastly inferior to decent VSTs'; 'vastly superior'; 'pretty comparable'. My reason for asking is that I have an X32, a few nice preamps, but no external compressor or EQ. I was thinking about getting a pair of compressors to lightly compress and color when tracking. If the FX rack effects on the X32 are comparable to solid VSTs then perhaps saving my hardware compressor money and using the X32 comps to track would make sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!