Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cary begans" data-source="post: 147647" data-attributes="member: 5902">Re: CableWould be great if that did negate the absolute need for shielded cable.The Gepco is quit nice save for that little part. The image of 2 redundant non shielded cables blissfully shorting out first one then the other then one then the other back and forth and yet never dropping the signal is heartening thought! Of course one would have to own an N+1 to enjoy such security! Probably only a few $ right?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cary begans, post: 147647, member: 5902"] Re: Cable Would be great if that did negate the absolute need for shielded cable.The Gepco is quit nice save for that little part. The image of 2 redundant non shielded cables blissfully shorting out first one then the other then one then the other back and forth and yet never dropping the signal is heartening thought! Of course one would have to own an N+1 to enjoy such security! Probably only a few $ right?:)~:-)~:smile: [/QUOTE]

Verification