Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian Boche" data-source="post: 51801" data-attributes="member: 1698"><p>re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>lol...sad but true:roll:</p><p>Now I got you, I don't know...did about 80 shows with the M400 and never got used to it (fixed frequencies+fader)...it is still "try&error" here. On the X32 you just turn the left encoder below the display and than you should NOT look at the EQ in the LCD, just look on the scribble strips on the DCAs. For me, it is fast and intuitive. But this is of course subjective, better build your own opinion on that. </p><p></p><p>BTW: I don't use GEQs often. I'm used to the FabFilter parametric EQ for mains & monitors and I use it with a mouse.8O~8-O~:shock: Way faster than any GEQ and way more precise. 31Band seems to be much, but for ringing out monitors, the iso frequencies are often to broadbent to my taste. Today I was playing around with a first version of the X32 remote-software and I'm very sure, that I won't use the build in GEQs at all. I like the idea of using the 6band prametric EQ (there is one in every output) instead and I will do it with a mouse or with a pen on my tablet PC. I'm used to that since the old Mackie TT24. The GEQs I would only need, when six bands of parametric EQ are not enough, which is also seldom here. </p><p>Anyway, I know, that this way of doing sound is disturbing for most other soundguys. But heh...what do you expect from a heavy SAC user?8)~<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" />~<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>Christian</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian Boche, post: 51801, member: 1698"] re: X32 Discussion lol...sad but true:roll: Now I got you, I don't know...did about 80 shows with the M400 and never got used to it (fixed frequencies+fader)...it is still "try&error" here. On the X32 you just turn the left encoder below the display and than you should NOT look at the EQ in the LCD, just look on the scribble strips on the DCAs. For me, it is fast and intuitive. But this is of course subjective, better build your own opinion on that. BTW: I don't use GEQs often. I'm used to the FabFilter parametric EQ for mains & monitors and I use it with a mouse.8O~8-O~:shock: Way faster than any GEQ and way more precise. 31Band seems to be much, but for ringing out monitors, the iso frequencies are often to broadbent to my taste. Today I was playing around with a first version of the X32 remote-software and I'm very sure, that I won't use the build in GEQs at all. I like the idea of using the 6band prametric EQ (there is one in every output) instead and I will do it with a mouse or with a pen on my tablet PC. I'm used to that since the old Mackie TT24. The GEQs I would only need, when six bands of parametric EQ are not enough, which is also seldom here. Anyway, I know, that this way of doing sound is disturbing for most other soundguys. But heh...what do you expect from a heavy SAC user?8)~8-)~:cool: Christian [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!