Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Per Søvik" data-source="post: 57706" data-attributes="member: 1285"><p>re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p>AES50 will only work as a direct cable connection with no routers or switches.</p><p></p><p>The remote control idea is quite interesting, but you would then use the LAN connection (and that could easily be wireless), not the AES50 (same plug and lead, different signals)</p><p>Haven't seen any mention of using one x32 to remote another, but if it is perceived as a good idea, they'll probably implement it. The advantage of doing that is obvious, but will limit how much monitor duty you can put on the onstage board, and you will not have any available audio at FOH, no input, no output. </p><p>Using the AES50 interface, all audio will travel back and forth and thus be more vulnerable to cable breach, but you'll have audio in out available at FOH, have more processing power etc.</p><p></p><p>Edit: some of this post is rather redundant after the last posting by Mr, Cagle, but I'll let it stand.</p><p>One thing though, SAC have lots of layers, so several remotes can work without disturbing each other, I think it would be harder to work a dual X32 remote arrangement without the two operators getting in each other's way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Per Søvik, post: 57706, member: 1285"] re: X32 Discussion AES50 will only work as a direct cable connection with no routers or switches. The remote control idea is quite interesting, but you would then use the LAN connection (and that could easily be wireless), not the AES50 (same plug and lead, different signals) Haven't seen any mention of using one x32 to remote another, but if it is perceived as a good idea, they'll probably implement it. The advantage of doing that is obvious, but will limit how much monitor duty you can put on the onstage board, and you will not have any available audio at FOH, no input, no output. Using the AES50 interface, all audio will travel back and forth and thus be more vulnerable to cable breach, but you'll have audio in out available at FOH, have more processing power etc. Edit: some of this post is rather redundant after the last posting by Mr, Cagle, but I'll let it stand. One thing though, SAC have lots of layers, so several remotes can work without disturbing each other, I think it would be harder to work a dual X32 remote arrangement without the two operators getting in each other's way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!