Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 58784" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not to add to the veer, historically early digital conversions were not very tolerant of overload, so it was prudent to saturate the analog path before the digital code could roll over (very nasty sounding). Modern digital conversion is much more benign when saturated but still not very desirable (IMO). </p><p></p><p>I already added my $0.02 in a midas thread about adding a soft clipping feature to mic preamps. Regarding mic preamp "sound", when not clipped, most sound very alike, because they are. When clipped they still "should" sound mostly similar, only somewhat less similar due to perhaps subtly different added distortion (not talking about a dedicated soft clipper). I suspect perceived headroom differences between some brands may be influenced by gain pot law, gain structure, metering, etc. </p><p></p><p>Way off topic for this thread, so I apologize.</p><p></p><p>JR</p><p></p><p>PS: Midas is not the only company to dabble into nonlinear transfer function at the top of the range to give the appearance of increased headroom or dynamic range. IIRC DBX was playing some games with one series of digital GEQ., and lets not forget all the clip limiters in analog power amps,,, Power to our inner DJ . <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 58784, member: 126"] re: X32 Discussion Not to add to the veer, historically early digital conversions were not very tolerant of overload, so it was prudent to saturate the analog path before the digital code could roll over (very nasty sounding). Modern digital conversion is much more benign when saturated but still not very desirable (IMO). I already added my $0.02 in a midas thread about adding a soft clipping feature to mic preamps. Regarding mic preamp "sound", when not clipped, most sound very alike, because they are. When clipped they still "should" sound mostly similar, only somewhat less similar due to perhaps subtly different added distortion (not talking about a dedicated soft clipper). I suspect perceived headroom differences between some brands may be influenced by gain pot law, gain structure, metering, etc. Way off topic for this thread, so I apologize. JR PS: Midas is not the only company to dabble into nonlinear transfer function at the top of the range to give the appearance of increased headroom or dynamic range. IIRC DBX was playing some games with one series of digital GEQ., and lets not forget all the clip limiters in analog power amps,,, Power to our inner DJ . :-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!