Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Christian Boche" data-source="post: 59272" data-attributes="member: 1698">re: X32 Discussionconfirmed! ;-)Concerning automation: The X32 has NO automation! Do it in your DAW, it is more powerfull than any console could be.I don&#039;t quite understand, why so much people want all the X32 faders to control their DAWs. When I do a band recording I normally end up with 50-120 tracks. So even with the 16 channel faders, I would have to &quot;jump&quot; through the banks as well.BTW: There is also a technical reason, why you can&#039;t use all the faders. Each Mackie Control unit eats up one entire midi port. The Midi is embedded with the audiostream of the build in recording card. This card offers just one midi port - that&#039;s it.The R&amp;D found at least a way to theoretical emulate more Midi ports, but this feature is not on top of their &quot;to do&quot; list. At least what I have heard.Christian</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Christian Boche, post: 59272, member: 1698"] re: X32 Discussion confirmed! ;-) Concerning automation: The X32 has NO automation! Do it in your DAW, it is more powerfull than any console could be. I don't quite understand, why so much people want all the X32 faders to control their DAWs. When I do a band recording I normally end up with 50-120 tracks. So even with the 16 channel faders, I would have to "jump" through the banks as well. BTW: There is also a technical reason, why you can't use all the faders. Each Mackie Control unit eats up one entire midi port. The Midi is embedded with the audiostream of the build in recording card. This card offers just one midi port - that's it. The R&D found at least a way to theoretical emulate more Midi ports, but this feature is not on top of their "to do" list. At least what I have heard. Christian [/QUOTE]

Verification