Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Babcock" data-source="post: 60227" data-attributes="member: 46"><p>re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My aversion to 96kHz is that it pulls the development team away from other tasks which have the potential to have more useful benefit for users.</p><p></p><p>FWIW - Yes, I have recorded at 96K. I can tell the difference. But to me the difference is not "better", it is just "different". I hear as much or possibly more difference between various converters as I do between the sample rate change. And nobody listening to the finished product which ends up back at 44.1 16bit (or worse still to compressed formats) can tell the difference between any of this stuff unless they hear it played back from the original 96K track, which doesn't happen much outside of studios.</p><p></p><p>Comparing this to black and white vs colour movies is a tremendous exaggeration of the difference. It's more like comparing a 1080p HDTV 120HZ to a 1080p HDTV 240HZ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Babcock, post: 60227, member: 46"] re: X32 Discussion My aversion to 96kHz is that it pulls the development team away from other tasks which have the potential to have more useful benefit for users. FWIW - Yes, I have recorded at 96K. I can tell the difference. But to me the difference is not "better", it is just "different". I hear as much or possibly more difference between various converters as I do between the sample rate change. And nobody listening to the finished product which ends up back at 44.1 16bit (or worse still to compressed formats) can tell the difference between any of this stuff unless they hear it played back from the original 96K track, which doesn't happen much outside of studios. Comparing this to black and white vs colour movies is a tremendous exaggeration of the difference. It's more like comparing a 1080p HDTV 120HZ to a 1080p HDTV 240HZ. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!