Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Per Søvik" data-source="post: 60499" data-attributes="member: 1285"><p>re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK, that makes sense to me, sort of. I have given up understanding Q in filters, because the definitions don't make practical sense to me, and have adopted a rule of thumb that makes sense to me in musical terms. I'm visualizing it as gauss curve where Q is sort of the inverse of the standard deviation in such a way that the inverse of Q represent the octave bandwith of the significantly audible effect of the EQ. Again, totally wrong as such, but it sort of tells me where I'm heading.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Per Søvik, post: 60499, member: 1285"] re: X32 Discussion OK, that makes sense to me, sort of. I have given up understanding Q in filters, because the definitions don't make practical sense to me, and have adopted a rule of thumb that makes sense to me in musical terms. I'm visualizing it as gauss curve where Q is sort of the inverse of the standard deviation in such a way that the inverse of Q represent the octave bandwith of the significantly audible effect of the EQ. Again, totally wrong as such, but it sort of tells me where I'm heading. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
