Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greg Hyson" data-source="post: 63541" data-attributes="member: 2106">re: X32 DiscussionI&#039;d like to see scalability in upcoming revisions. It would be nice have the ability to go from a 16 input configuration to a 48 input without abandoning previously purchased hardware (for instance having an X16 and X32 rack processor). I guess this is a similar concept to the Studiolive linking where outputs can be shared between two mixers and maybe even effects processing. The kicker would be having an option of a control surface that used an Ipad as your main display but had all of the physical buttons and faders at FOH. I vote to keep it at 2 rack spaces with minimal inputs and outputs on the rack unit itself focusing mainly on the AES50 format to provide your I/O.It seems everybody is asking for the same things of the X32:96k operationUse the entire board as a control surfaceA restructuring of the format might make it easier to employ those features.Greg</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greg Hyson, post: 63541, member: 2106"] re: X32 Discussion I'd like to see scalability in upcoming revisions. It would be nice have the ability to go from a 16 input configuration to a 48 input without abandoning previously purchased hardware (for instance having an X16 and X32 rack processor). I guess this is a similar concept to the Studiolive linking where outputs can be shared between two mixers and maybe even effects processing. The kicker would be having an option of a control surface that used an Ipad as your main display but had all of the physical buttons and faders at FOH. I vote to keep it at 2 rack spaces with minimal inputs and outputs on the rack unit itself focusing mainly on the AES50 format to provide your I/O. It seems everybody is asking for the same things of the X32: 96k operation Use the entire board as a control surface A restructuring of the format might make it easier to employ those features. Greg [/QUOTE]

Verification