Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Eric Eskam" data-source="post: 65697" data-attributes="member: 2124">re: X32 DiscussionI agree!&nbsp; If the physical control surface is sufficient and it&#039;s just a matter of software - well, there are multiple ways to handle that.&nbsp; It will be interesting to see what the Behringer boys can come up with.&nbsp; They certainly have been full of good surprises so far!Woah - I&#039;m not ready to declare things &quot;wrong&quot; - not yet 8)~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="8-)" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; 8-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname="8-)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eric Eskam, post: 65697, member: 2124"] re: X32 Discussion I agree! If the physical control surface is sufficient and it's just a matter of software - well, there are multiple ways to handle that. It will be interesting to see what the Behringer boys can come up with. They certainly have been full of good surprises so far! Woah - I'm not ready to declare things "wrong" - not yet 8)~8-)~:cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification