Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Per Søvik" data-source="post: 66967" data-attributes="member: 1285"><p>Re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm getting more and more confused, and allthough I've been able to get the effects to work in various manners, either doing it the way that is described or inserting the effects in the mix-busses, I'm quite certain that the block diagram and the information on the screens in no way indicates that the faders on the mix busses have to be turned up for the effects to sound. </p><p>By all accounts, the effect in it's initial state will get the signal from the mix bus and is set to, and able to, provide a signal straight to the main mix bus. The effect should therefore be independent of the mix bus processing channel, including the fader. I'm quite sure I've had it working like this, at least in an older firmware version. </p><p>I'll go down to the workshop later and investigate, because I certainly got mighty confused the other night about this and other routing issues. Managed to get everything working but am convinced that there was a lot of double routing going on at the end of it all.</p><p>(lack of practice and still set in old ways I know <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile: )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Per Søvik, post: 66967, member: 1285"] Re: X32 Discussion I'm getting more and more confused, and allthough I've been able to get the effects to work in various manners, either doing it the way that is described or inserting the effects in the mix-busses, I'm quite certain that the block diagram and the information on the screens in no way indicates that the faders on the mix busses have to be turned up for the effects to sound. By all accounts, the effect in it's initial state will get the signal from the mix bus and is set to, and able to, provide a signal straight to the main mix bus. The effect should therefore be independent of the mix bus processing channel, including the fader. I'm quite sure I've had it working like this, at least in an older firmware version. I'll go down to the workshop later and investigate, because I certainly got mighty confused the other night about this and other routing issues. Managed to get everything working but am convinced that there was a lot of double routing going on at the end of it all. (lack of practice and still set in old ways I know :)~:-)~:smile: ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!