Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 67050" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: X32 DiscussionThere is no problem with the effects, and they work the way it is described, so no problem there if I follow the prescribed procedure.My issue, problem or whatever is that I don&#039;t like learning procedures i don&#039;t fully understand, but work from an understanding of how things work and how things are connected, so there is a logic connection between my mental image, what I observe and the procedure I&#039;m following. Fully understanding the logic of a procedure makes it so much easier to remember.In my mind, there is a discrepancy between the block diagram, the representation on the screen menus, the logic of the third fader layer and what is actually going on.Aux and fx on the layer are represented the same way, output can apparently be routed in exactly the same manner.The bus channel that the fx is associated to indicates that the effect is not inserted to that bus channel, and logically the output fader of that bus channel shouldn&#039;t affect the fx return.I know that my mental image of how the effect is routed is wrong, and have no problem accepting that. I guess I would like a diagram showing the exact effect routing <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 67050, member: 1285"] Re: X32 Discussion There is no problem with the effects, and they work the way it is described, so no problem there if I follow the prescribed procedure. My issue, problem or whatever is that I don't like learning procedures i don't fully understand, but work from an understanding of how things work and how things are connected, so there is a logic connection between my mental image, what I observe and the procedure I'm following. Fully understanding the logic of a procedure makes it so much easier to remember. In my mind, there is a discrepancy between the block diagram, the representation on the screen menus, the logic of the third fader layer and what is actually going on. Aux and fx on the layer are represented the same way, output can apparently be routed in exactly the same manner. The bus channel that the fx is associated to indicates that the effect is not inserted to that bus channel, and logically the output fader of that bus channel shouldn't affect the fx return. I know that my mental image of how the effect is routed is wrong, and have no problem accepting that. I guess I would like a diagram showing the exact effect routing :)~:-)~:smile: [/QUOTE]

Verification