Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 67229" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: X32 DiscussionThose who think it&#039;s a really bad idea will probably say so everytime the question come up, and I don&#039;t blame them.Even if firmware was to be implemented that tucked the settings away in some dark, hard to find location with trolls and dragons at the gate, a full system reset would still be likely to cause havoc, or if it didn&#039;t and some outputs would defaulted to a safe state, what should that safe state be? And how would you protect the S16 from getting routed the wrong way? &quot;Many pitfalls here, better leave it be.&quot; would be the prudent and most likely the correct decision. Providing a feature that potentially would help clients destroy their speakers, and getting blamed for it whenever it happens for whatever reason, is not likely to be a very attractive proposition for Behringer. But one can allways hope that some of the things that would be helpfull will get implemented eventually, like selectable slope filters, polarity flip on outputs, additional routing flexibility etc. One prerequisite for being able to implement a full crossover function would be that they get rid of the power-up/reset pop, untill then I&#039;ll happily do my subs to powered tops processing and move my dbx drpa+ to monitor duty giving me two more individual feedback controlled monitor channels <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 67229, member: 1285"] Re: X32 Discussion Those who think it's a really bad idea will probably say so everytime the question come up, and I don't blame them. Even if firmware was to be implemented that tucked the settings away in some dark, hard to find location with trolls and dragons at the gate, a full system reset would still be likely to cause havoc, or if it didn't and some outputs would defaulted to a safe state, what should that safe state be? And how would you protect the S16 from getting routed the wrong way? "Many pitfalls here, better leave it be." would be the prudent and most likely the correct decision. Providing a feature that potentially would help clients destroy their speakers, and getting blamed for it whenever it happens for whatever reason, is not likely to be a very attractive proposition for Behringer. But one can allways hope that some of the things that would be helpfull will get implemented eventually, like selectable slope filters, polarity flip on outputs, additional routing flexibility etc. One prerequisite for being able to implement a full crossover function would be that they get rid of the power-up/reset pop, untill then I'll happily do my subs to powered tops processing and move my dbx drpa+ to monitor duty giving me two more individual feedback controlled monitor channels :)~:-)~:smile: [/QUOTE]

Verification