Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Clark" data-source="post: 67806" data-attributes="member: 2763"><p>Confirming the straight-thru patch</p><p></p><p>I asked this on PSW a few months ago, but because the X32 was so new and the S-16's weren't really around no one really had a definite answer, I'm hoping now that there's more out there someone has had experience doing this or can give it a test run...</p><p></p><p>The opinions about keeping your processor in your amp racks notwithstanding, it looked like from John D's post that it is possible to route a group of inputs directly to a group of outputs, in my case (and it looked like some others would use this too) I would like to take the outputs from the system processor in a booth (install environment) to a set of local inputs on the X32 (we'll say 25-32, as in my attachment of the Xcontrol I was playing with a while back) straight to a set of outputs on an S-16 for amps at the stage. Would this eat up the "maximum" number of channels that can be routed within the system? Any other concerns or issues with doing this?</p><p></p><p>I look forward to working with this system once my employer's 2013 budget goes into effect and we can get one. I just hope by that time the extra security lockouts (locking out certain levels of control while keeping the faders and such active) are implemented into the firmware.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Clark, post: 67806, member: 2763"] Confirming the straight-thru patch I asked this on PSW a few months ago, but because the X32 was so new and the S-16's weren't really around no one really had a definite answer, I'm hoping now that there's more out there someone has had experience doing this or can give it a test run... The opinions about keeping your processor in your amp racks notwithstanding, it looked like from John D's post that it is possible to route a group of inputs directly to a group of outputs, in my case (and it looked like some others would use this too) I would like to take the outputs from the system processor in a booth (install environment) to a set of local inputs on the X32 (we'll say 25-32, as in my attachment of the Xcontrol I was playing with a while back) straight to a set of outputs on an S-16 for amps at the stage. Would this eat up the "maximum" number of channels that can be routed within the system? Any other concerns or issues with doing this? I look forward to working with this system once my employer's 2013 budget goes into effect and we can get one. I just hope by that time the extra security lockouts (locking out certain levels of control while keeping the faders and such active) are implemented into the firmware. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!