Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mick Berg" data-source="post: 68287" data-attributes="member: 2512">Re: How to do an analog insert?I see that you can select &quot;OFF&quot; (it really should be &quot;NONE&quot;) as an input source for any channel (except some, see below) so the answer is yes. Maybe this should be automated, ie if an aux return is used as the return of an insert, that aux return channel should have its source changed to &quot;OFF&quot;. Not a big deal, however.Incidentally, I noticed that you can&#039;t change the source of the FX return channels, at least in XControl. I was moving my FX returns up into the 17-32 layer, just to reduce the number of layers needed, and saw that you couldn&#039;t remove them from their default positions on the Aux-FX layer, and so that means you can&#039;t use channels 42-48 for anything other than FX returns. Again, not a big deal.The more I learn about this console the more I like it. I&#039;m expecting to get one for evaluation on Wednesday. Can&#039;t wait!Mick Berg.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mick Berg, post: 68287, member: 2512"] Re: How to do an analog insert? I see that you can select "OFF" (it really should be "NONE") as an input source for any channel (except some, see below) so the answer is yes. Maybe this should be automated, ie if an aux return is used as the return of an insert, that aux return channel should have its source changed to "OFF". Not a big deal, however. Incidentally, I noticed that you can't change the source of the FX return channels, at least in XControl. I was moving my FX returns up into the 17-32 layer, just to reduce the number of layers needed, and saw that you couldn't remove them from their default positions on the Aux-FX layer, and so that means you can't use channels 42-48 for anything other than FX returns. Again, not a big deal. The more I learn about this console the more I like it. I'm expecting to get one for evaluation on Wednesday. Can't wait! Mick Berg. [/QUOTE]

Verification