Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Clark" data-source="post: 68400" data-attributes="member: 2763"><p>Re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you tested to make sure you would've lost control of the matrix? If it is as Robert theorizes:</p><p></p><p>(which I could think might be caused by something out of "alignment" between what I assume is the stepper motor controlling the fader and the sensor that detects the position of said fader) - this may not be an issue with unlinked faders, but with links then Robert may be right, it may be one fader detecting the position incorrectly, correcting the other one, and back and forth etc...</p><p></p><p>My point being, that if, after adjusting the faders back to positon to their desired location, you were to switch to another fader bank, then that matrix set would no longer be "controlled" by the faulty faders, would it? (Until you have to go back to that page...) This would be something to try, just to help determine where the problem lies, I would think...</p><p></p><p>Also, can you not reassign Matrices 1&2 to a different set of faders without having to reconfigure the sends to the matrices? Or are those not as assignable? (Thinking something that could've been done to get you through the gig). </p><p>Another idea that I'm not sure if it would work since I haven't seen the interaction between the X32 and the xcontrol, does the selected layer on the board always follow what is selected in xcontrol? Or could you select on of the other two layers on the board and keep the Matrix layer selected on xcontrol to keep tabs on it?</p><p></p><p>I realize these are all moot points right now since the gig is over and there is a support request in, I'm just thinking through in my mind how this could've been worked around during a show where this started happening. (And also completely realizing that these are things that shouldn't happen but do... As someone else said, this happens on mixers 10x the price of the X32, so I don't blame Behringer for this... As a programmer in my spare time I'm very aware of how bugs can happen at the least expected and most inopportune time)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Clark, post: 68400, member: 2763"] Re: X32 Discussion Have you tested to make sure you would've lost control of the matrix? If it is as Robert theorizes: (which I could think might be caused by something out of "alignment" between what I assume is the stepper motor controlling the fader and the sensor that detects the position of said fader) - this may not be an issue with unlinked faders, but with links then Robert may be right, it may be one fader detecting the position incorrectly, correcting the other one, and back and forth etc... My point being, that if, after adjusting the faders back to positon to their desired location, you were to switch to another fader bank, then that matrix set would no longer be "controlled" by the faulty faders, would it? (Until you have to go back to that page...) This would be something to try, just to help determine where the problem lies, I would think... Also, can you not reassign Matrices 1&2 to a different set of faders without having to reconfigure the sends to the matrices? Or are those not as assignable? (Thinking something that could've been done to get you through the gig). Another idea that I'm not sure if it would work since I haven't seen the interaction between the X32 and the xcontrol, does the selected layer on the board always follow what is selected in xcontrol? Or could you select on of the other two layers on the board and keep the Matrix layer selected on xcontrol to keep tabs on it? I realize these are all moot points right now since the gig is over and there is a support request in, I'm just thinking through in my mind how this could've been worked around during a show where this started happening. (And also completely realizing that these are things that shouldn't happen but do... As someone else said, this happens on mixers 10x the price of the X32, so I don't blame Behringer for this... As a programmer in my spare time I'm very aware of how bugs can happen at the least expected and most inopportune time) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!