Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 71815" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: Vertical pairingI believe most of us would be adequately served if the VLink option was kept simple as in 1 and 17, 2 and 18 etc. Would make for easy connection of stereo devices in the basic routing configuration, and when the need arise to pair off other sources, we can easily reroute to fit the scheme. Wouldn&#039;t be too confusing either <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile:On a related note, it would be good if the DCAs could be assigned to any channel, so one could use the DCA layer exclusively instead of having to change layers to access channels not assignable to DCA&nbsp; (I know you can get weird results when you are allowed to assign the same dca to more than one point in the signal chain, but to climb a mountain you need enough rope to potentially hang yourself <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />~;-)~:wink:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 71815, member: 1285"] Re: Vertical pairing I believe most of us would be adequately served if the VLink option was kept simple as in 1 and 17, 2 and 18 etc. Would make for easy connection of stereo devices in the basic routing configuration, and when the need arise to pair off other sources, we can easily reroute to fit the scheme. Wouldn't be too confusing either :)~:-)~:smile: On a related note, it would be good if the DCAs could be assigned to any channel, so one could use the DCA layer exclusively instead of having to change layers to access channels not assignable to DCA (I know you can get weird results when you are allowed to assign the same dca to more than one point in the signal chain, but to climb a mountain you need enough rope to potentially hang yourself ;)~;-)~:wink: [/QUOTE]

Verification